Article Sidebar
Downloads
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research is a classroom action research study of the Gal'Perin model implementation process, the results of performance improvement and critical thinking skills (CBC) of students. Based on classroom action research for 2 cycles, it was found that the implementation of learning by the model lecturers using the Gal'Perin model had been 100% successful. Active students show scores above ≥ 75% and can be given active students. The average score of students' learning activeness from cycle I always shows improvement compared to previous meetings. Cycle I scores reach 72 and Cycle II reaches 79. The average CBC as a form of student learning outcomes classically in cycle 1 consists of 79 and in cycle 2 amounts to 82, thereby increasing the increase that does not show a significant difference what is evident from paired tests t-test with Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.149, which means greater than 0.05, then conclusions can be drawn that are not significantly different between the results of KBK cycle 1 and cycle 2.
Keywords
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author (s)
2. The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
- Arnyana, I. B. P. 2006. Pengaruh Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Pada
- Pelajaran Biologi Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMA.
- Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran IKIP Negeri Singaraja. No. 3, Tahun
- XXXIX (halaman 496-515).
- Ariyati, Eka. 2010. Pembelajaran Berbasis Praktikum Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa. Jurnal Matematika dan IPA, Vol. 1 No. 2. (Diunduh 17 Agustus 2019).
- Kemmis, S & Mc Taggart, R. 1992. The Action Research Planner. Australia:Deakin University Press.
- Nasution. 2008. Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
- Riduwan. 2013. Dasar-dasar Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta
- Rooijakkers, Ad. 1989. Mengajar Dengan Sukses. Jakarta: PT.Gramedia
- Siregar, Sofyan. 2012. Statistik deskriptif untuk Penelitian. Jakarta: Rajawali
- Soejoeti, Zanzawi. 1985. Buku Materi Pokok Metode Statistik I. Modul 1-5. Jakarta: Karunika
- Soenarko, Bambang. 1993. Pengantar Statistika. Kediri: IKIP PGRI Kediri
- Splitter, L. J. 1991. Critical Thinking : What, Why, When, and How. Educational Philosophy and Teory 23 (1). 89-109.
- Taqwa, Muhammad. 2019. Efektivitas Pembelajaran Dengan Metode Galperin Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa SMA Efektivitas Pembelajaran Dengan Metode Galperin Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, Vol. 3 (1), 71-86. (Diunduh 26 Agustus 2019).
- Taniredja,Tukiran dkk. 2012. Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Bandung: Alfabeta
- USAID. 2014. Praktik yang Baik dalam Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar dan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (SD/MI). Malang: Pelatihan Profesionalitas Dosen
- Utomo, Tjipto. Dkk. 1991. Peningkatan dan Pengembangan Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama