The Effectiveness of Group Guidance Model Using the Noble Value of “Nrimo Ing Pandum” to Increase Empathy
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to identify the effectiveness of the group guidance model using the noble value of "Nrimo Ing Pandum" to increase student empathy as a conflict prevention. This study uses an experimental method with a one group pre-test and post-test design to measure changes in the level of empathy in research subjects before and after treatment, although without a control group to compare the effects of the treatment. This study used a sample of 8 guidance and counseling students at PGRI Adi Buana University, Surabaya. One of the causes of student conflict is low empathy. Empathy can be increased with group guidance techniques. The SPSS test value is known to be Asymp. Sig (2-tailed) is 0.042 which means less than 0.05 so that the hypothesis is accepted (Ha). The results that can be concluded are that the group guidance model using the noble value of "Nrimo Ing Pandum" is effective in increasing student empathy as a conflict prevention.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
How to Cite
References
Ardi, Z., Safari, I., & Ifdil, I. (2022). Integrating local wisdom in character education to promote tolerance in multicultural societies. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 24(1), 57–74.
Batson, C. D. (2017). What’s wrong with morality?. Oxford University Press.
Ben-Moshe, Nir. 2020. “Making Sense of Smith on Sympathy and Approbation: Other-Oriented Sympathy as a Psychological and Normative Achievement.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (4): 735–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2019.1667292.
Cook, J. L., & Cook, G. (2018). Child development: Principles and perspectives (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Davis, M. H. (2015). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Routledge.
Decety, J., & Cowell, J. M. (2015). Empathy, justice, and moral behavior. AJOB Neuroscience, 6(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2015.1047055.
Decety, J., & Cowell, J. M. (2015). The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(5), 293-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.001.
Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 100-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100.
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science (7th ed., Vol. 3). Wiley.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Geertz, C. (1961). The Javanese family: A study of kinship and socialization. Free Press.
Gerdes, K. E., Segal, E. A., Jackson, K., & Mullins, J. (2011). Measuring empathy in social work research: Review of empirical studies. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731511410318.
Gibson, R. L., & Mitchell, M. H. (2011). Introduction to counseling and guidance (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Handayani, M., Jayadilaga, Y., Fitri, A., Rachman, D.A., Istiqamah, N., Kas. S.Z. (2023). Sosialisasi dan Pengenalan Aplikasi Pengolahan Data SPSS pada Mahasiswa Administrasi Kesehatan Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan dan Kesehatan. Jurnal Informasi Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(2), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.47861/jipm-nalanda.v1i2.170.
Hidayati, A. (2022). Enkulturasi budaya dalam membangun identitas nasional pada era globalisasi. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 15(2), 145–156.
Hodges, S. D., & Klein, K. J. (2001). The empathic-accuracy model of conflict resolution. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(2), 323-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02588.x.
Hodges, S. D., & Klein, K. J. K. (2001). Regulating the costs of empathy: The price of being human. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(5), 437–452.
Irfani, M., & Riyanti, A. D. (2021). Revitalisasi nilai budaya dalam memperkuat toleransi sosial di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 6(3), 290–305.
Kosslyn, S. M., & Nelson, T. O. (2017). Educating the mind without educating the heart is no education at all: Integrating emotional intelligence. Psychology Press.
Koudenburg, N., Postmes, T., & Gordijn, E. H. (2017). Beyond content of conversation: The role of conversational form in the emergence and regulation of social structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(1), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315626022.
Kurniawati, R., & Harmaini, H. (2020). Kecanduan Game Online dan Empati pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi,16(1), 65–73.
Maharani, A. (2018). Konsep nrimo ing pandum dalam budaya Jawa: Relevansi terhadap pendidikan karakter. Penerbit Ombak.
Manning, J. M., & Taylor, R. A. (2004). Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxxxx.
Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Santrock, J.W. (2011). Life-Span Development: Perkembangan Masa Hidup Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Spreng, R. N., McKinnon, M. C., Mar, R. A., & Levine, B. (2009). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484381.
Subagya, P. (2020). Nilai nrimo dalam budaya Jawa dan relevansinya dalam pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 4(2), 334–342.
Sundayana, A. (2019). Metode statistik dalam penelitian: Penerapan uji Wilcoxon pada data ordinal. Jurnal Statistik dan Metodologi, 12(1), 45-60.
Susanti, D., & Ifdil, I. (2023). Hubungan Empati dengan Altruisme Mahasiswa. Education and Social Sciences Review, 4(1), 44–60.
Suyanto, B. (2021). Pendidikan karakter berbasis budaya lokal dalam era globalisasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 11(1), 12–23.
Taufik. (2012). Empati (Pendekatan Psikologi Sosial). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Tazkia, H., & Prihartanti, N. (2021). Hubungan Antara Pola Asuh Demokratis dan Kematangan Emosi dengan Empati Mahasiswa Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Wibowo. (2005). Konseling kelompok perkembangan. Semarang: UPT UNNES Press.
Zaki, J. (2020). Empathy: A motivated perspective-taking. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.004.
Zaki, J. (2020). The war for kindness: Building empathy in a fractured world. Broadway Books.