Peer Review Process

Review Process:

  1. Editor receiving manuscript from author;
  2. The editor evaluate manuscript (journal aim and scope, in house style, supplementary data); (Rejected if not meet criteria)
  3. Editor screening for plagiarism on offline and online database manually; (Rejected if found major plagiarism, contacted author if found redundancy or minor plagiarism for clarification)
  4. Editor sends the manuscript to reviewer along with review form (double-blind review, Both reviewer and author remain anonymous to each other);
  5. Reviewer send back his review form to Editor (with revised manuscript if necessary);
  6. Editor decision (rejected, require major revision, need minor revision, or accepted);
  7. Confirmation to the Author.
  8. If a revision, the author revised manuscripts and should be returned to the editor without delay. Returned later than three months will be considered as new submissions.

http://www.eurjhm.com/public/site/images/administrador/esquema.png