Global research trends on computational thinking in mathematics education: A bibliometric analysis (2000–2025)

Authors

  • Fauziah Sumarno Ahmad Dahlan University
  • Suparman Suparman Ahmad Dahlan University
  • Kunti Robiatul Mahmudah Ahmad Dahlan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v11i2.25725

Keywords:

Computational Thinking, Bibliometric, Mathematics Education, VOSviewer

Abstract

This study aims to identify global trends, scientific collaborations, and developments in computational thinking topics in the context of mathematics education through bibliometric analysis. The method refers to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to improve transparency and quality of reporting. Data were taken from the Dimensions database for the period 2000–2025 and analyzed using VOSviewer software. The results show a significant increase in publications and citations since 2016, with the peak of publications occurring in 2023 and the highest citations in 2024. SDG 4: Quality Education is the theme most often associated with computational thinking, although contributions to Mathematics Education are still limited. The journal Education and Information Technologies is the most dominant publication medium, with researchers such as Weipeng Yang and Gary Ka Wai Wong as the main contributors. The visualization of the keyword network highlights the large focus on computational thinking skills, while mathematics education is in a peripheral position, indicating a suboptimal relationship. The visualization of co-authorship also shows the formation of strong global collaborations. The positive correlation between the number of publications and citations indicates that scientific productivity plays a major role in research visibility. These findings provide an important basis for developing further research into the integration of computational thinking into 21st century mathematics learning.

Abstract views: 205 , PDF downloads: 109

References

Agbo, F. J., Oyelere, S. S., Suhonen, J., & Adewumi, S. (2019, 2019). A Systematic Review of Computational Thinking Approach for Programming Education in Higher Education Institutions Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, https://doi.org/10.1145/3364510.3364521

Angraini, L. M., Kania, N., & Gürbüz, F. (2024). Students' Proficiency in Computational Thinking Through Constructivist Learning Theory. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v2i1.963

Aulia, E. S., & Rusli, R. P. (2020). Manfaat Kajian Bibliometrik Sebagai Penunjang Analisis Kebutuhan Kurikulum Program Studi Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi. Inovasi Kurikulum, 17(2), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v17i2.36827

Aytekin, A., & Topcu, M. S. (2024). Improving 6th Grade Students' Creative Problem Solving Skills Through Plugged and Unplugged Computational Thinking Approaches. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(6), 867–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10130-y

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard educational review.

Cheng, F. F., Huang, Y. W., Tsaih, D. C., & Wu, C. S. (2019). Trend analysis of co-authorship network in Library Hi Tech. Library Hi Tech, 37(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-11-2017-0241

Damayanti, F. N., Lutfitasari, A., Santosa, B., Prakasiwi, S. I., Suparman, & Anggraini, N. N. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends and Novelty of Midwifery Policy. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. repository. unimus. ac. id. https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/14031

DuVal, K. (2006). The native ground: Indians and colonists in the heart of the continent. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Ferreira, T. D., Santos, J. S., Araújo Medeiros, R. d., Andrade, W. L., Brunet, J., & Araujo Melo, M. R. (2023). Exploring the Relationship of Mathematical Reasoning and Computational Thinking. In Workshop de Informática na Escola (WIE (pp. 583–591). https://doi.org/10.5753/wie.2023.235113

Glänzel, W., & Chi, P. S. (2020). The big challenge of Scientometrics 2.0: exploring the broader impact of scientific research in public health. Scientometrics, 125(2), 1011–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03473-x

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K-12. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x12463051

Hanid, A., Fadzil, M., Said, H., Nihra, M., Yahaya, N., & Abdullah, Z. (2022). The Elements of Computational Thinking in Learning Geometry by Using Augmented Reality Application. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM, 16(02), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i02.27295

Helsa, Y., Turmudi, & Juandi, D. (2023a). Computational Thinking dalam Pembelajaran Matematika (Cetakan Pertama. Deepublish Publisher.

Helsa, Y., Turmudi, & Juandi, D. (2023b). TPACK-based hybrid learning model design for computational thinking skills achievement in mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(2), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i2.pp225-252

Herzog, C., Hook, D., & Konkiel, S. (2020). Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00020

Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding.

Huda, N., & Ikhsan, J. (2024). Computational Thinking Skills: Definisi, Kontroversi, dan Integrasinya dalam Pendidikan (D. R. P. Cetakan Pertama, S. Khoriyati, & Eds, Eds.). Bumi Aksara.

Hwang, G., & Tu, Y. (2021). Roles and Research Trends of Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics Education: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis and. Systematic Review. Mathematics, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060584

Kallia, M., Borkulo, S. P., Drijvers, P., Barendsen, E., & Tolboom, J. (2021). Characterising computational thinking in mathematics education: a literature-informed Delphi study. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 159–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1852104

Kannadass, P., Hidayat, R., Siregar, P. S., & Husain, A. P. (2023). Relationship Between Computational and Critical Thinking Towards Modelling Competency Among Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers. Tem Journal. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem123-17

Kaswar, A. B., & Nurjannah, N. (2024). Keefektifan computational thinking dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa. SIGMA: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA, 16(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.26618/sigma.v16i1.14574

Knie, L., Standl, B., & Schwarzer, S. (2022). First experiences of integrating computational thinking into a blended learning in‐service training program for STEM teachers. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(5), 1423–1439. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22529

Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2020). On Computational Thinking and STEM Education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00044-w

Maharani, S., Kholid, M. N., Pradana, L. N., & Nusantara, T. (2019). Problem solving in the context of computational thinking. Infinity Journal, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i2.p109-116

Maharani, S., Susanti, V. D., Andari, T., Krisdiana, I., & Astuti, I. P. (2023). Trend Publication of Computational Thinking in Mathematics Education. Bibliometric Review. Jipm. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v12i1.17654

Manullang, S. B., & Simanjuntak, E. (2023). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning terhadap Kemampuan Computational Thinking Berbantuan Media Geogebra. Journal on Education, 06(01), 7786–7796.

Mohmad, A. F., & Maat, S. M. (2023). Computational Thinking Activities Among Mathematics Teachers: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i3/18988

OECD. (2016). What is PISA for Development? OECD.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The prisma 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Medicina Fluminensis, 57, 444–465. https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2021_264903

Pajow, M. A., Regar, V. E., & Maukar, M. G. (2024). Hubungan Kemampuan Computational Thinking dan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa Materi Pola Bilangan. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 544–554. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v4i1.1661

Park, W., & Kwon, H. (2022). Research Trends and Issues Including Computational Thinking in Science Education and Mathematics Education in the Republic of Korea. Journal of Baltic Science Education. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.875

Piaget, J. (1970). Inteligencia y adaptación biológica. Los procesos de adaptación, 1(1), 69-84.

Putri, I. A., Tanjung, M. S., & Siregar, R. (2024). Studi Literatur: Pentingnya Berpikir Komputasional dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Peserta Didik. Bilangan: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Kebumian Dan Angkasa, 2(2), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.62383/bilangan.v2i2.36

Raman, A., Thannimalai, R., Don, Y., & Rathakrishnan, M. (2021). A Bibliometric Analysis of Blended Learning in Higher Education: Perception. Achievement and Engagement. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.6.7

Refvik, K. A. S., & Bjerke, A. H. (2022). Computational thinking as a tool in primary and secondary mathematical problem solving: a literature review. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v27i3.149191

Santosa, B., & Damayanti, F. N. (2024). Trends in iron deficiency anemia research 2010-2023: a bibliometric analysis. repository.unimus.ac.id.

Sumarno, F., & Suparman, S. (2024). Pemetaan Tren Global Riset Etnomatematika dalam Pendidikan: Analisis Bibliometrik 2000-2023. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v13i1.19960

Supiarmo, M. G., Hadi, H. S., & Tarmuzi, T. (2022). Studentâ€TMs Computational Thinking Process in Solving PISA Questions in Terms of Problem Solving Abilities. JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING. https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v5i1.p01-11

Szomszor, M., Adams, J., Fry, R., Gebert, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Potter, R. W. K., & Rogers, G. (2021). Interpreting Bibliometric Data. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.628703

Tian, S. (2024). The Impact and Reconstruction of Computational Thinking on Educational Models in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 14(3), 47–50. https://doi.org/10.54097/e2s41q04

Tupan, T., Rahayu, R. N., Rachmawati, R., & Rahayu, E. S. R. (2018). Analisis Bibliometrik Perkembangan Penelitian Bidang Ilmu Instrumentasi (Vol. 39). Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi. https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v39i2.413

UNESCO. (2018). Global Education Meeting, Brussels Declaration. UNESCO.

Wing, J. M. (2008, 2008). Computational Thinking and Thinking About Computing Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing, https://doi.org/10.1109/ipdps.2008.4536091

Wiryasaputra, R., Salomo, A., Sevani, N., & Seruni. (2022). Peningkatan Pola Berpikir Komputasi pada Siswa/i SMAK MATER DEI Melalui Bahasa Pemrograman Java dan Python. Servirisma, 2(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.21460/servirisma.2022.22.28

Wufron. (2020). Analisis Regresi Linier dengan IBM SPSS Statistics. OSFPREPRINTS, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/fwex8

Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7

Zakaria, P., Djakaria, I., Amin, R. M., Katili, S., Majid, M., & Maharani, S. (2023). The Relationship Between Computational Thinking and Critical Thinking Disposition in Mathematical Problem Solving: Bibliometric Analysis. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(3), 2857–2865. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.3162

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Sumarno, F., Suparman, S., & Mahmudah, K. R. . (2025). Global research trends on computational thinking in mathematics education: A bibliometric analysis (2000–2025). Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah Di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 200-219. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v11i2.25725

Similar Articles

41-50 of 105

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.