Pre-service mathematics teachers’ understanding of vector
Abstract views: 83
,
PDF downloads: 101
Abstract
Vector is an important concept in mathematics. Pre-service mathematics teachers explore vector concepts in several courses. This concept is also related to various concepts in mathematics. The purpose of this study is to describe the pre-service mathematics teachers' understanding of vectors. This research is non-experimental research with a descriptive design. 67 pre-service mathematics teachers are participants in this study. Data were collected by survey method using the Test of Understanding of Vector instrument. Data analysis was carried out quantitatively using descriptive and inferential statistics. The descriptive statistics used are the average, maximum, minimum, and standard deviation. The inferential statistics used are t-test statistics. The results showed that in general, the pre-service mathematics teachers' understanding of vectors was in the medium category. The results also show that there is no difference in understanding of vectors between male and female pre-service mathematics teachers. However, in the two concepts, namely "unit vector" and "scalar multiplication" there are significant differences between males and females.
References
Bani-salameh, H. N., Alkofahi, K. A., & Al-khateeb, H. M. (2020). ScienceDirect Investigating the Knowledge of Vector Concepts of First Year Medical Students. Health Professions Education, 6(3), 428–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2020.05.001
Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2012). Students’ difficulties with unit vectors and scalar multiplication of a vector. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1413(February), 115–118. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3680007
Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2013). Testing Students ’ Understanding of Vector Concepts. 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2013.pr.004
Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2014a). Students ’ difficulties in problems that involve unit-vector notation. Latin American Journal of Physics Education, 8(4), 1–10.
Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2014b). Test of understanding of vectors : A reliable multiple-choice vector concept test. 010121, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010121
Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2014c). Test of understanding of vectors: A reliable multiple-choice vector concept test. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010121
Bollen, L., Van Kampen, P., Baily, C., Kelly, M., & De Cock, M. (2017). Student difficulties regarding symbolic and graphical representations of vector fields. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020109
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.
Deprez, T., Gijsen, S. E., Deprez, J., & De Cock, M. (2019). Investigating student understanding of cross products in a mathematical and two electromagnetism contexts. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 20132. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020132
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational Research_ An Introduction (7th Edition). Pearson.
Jewaru, A. A. L., Umrotul, Kusairi, S., & Pramono, N. A. (2021). Senior high school students understanding of vector concepts in mathematical and physical representations. AIP Conference Proceedings, 050024(March), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043433
Mumpuni, P. W., Inganah , S., & Sugiarti, W. (2020). Penerapan model pembelajaran window shopping materi vektor untuk meningkatkan hasil dan minat belajar matematika. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah Di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v6i2.12827
Oktavianty, B. E. (2021). Analysis of Pre-Service Physics Teachers ’ Understanding of Vectors and Forces.
Pratama, A. C., Supahar, Warsono, & Jumadi. (2018). The development physics essay test to measure vector and mathematics representation ability in senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012013
Rakkapao, S., Prasitpong, S., & Arayathanitkul, K. (2016). Analysis test of understanding of vectors with the three-parameter logistic model of item response theory and item response curves technique. 020135, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020135
Saputri, D. E., Shodiqin, M. I., & Kurniawan, B. R. (2019). Pemahaman Konsep Vektor Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika Dan Pembelajarannya, 41–47.
Saraçoglu, H., & Kol, Ö. (2018). Evaluation of teacher candidates ’ knowledge about vectors. 19(2).
Stewart, J. (2012). Calculus: Early Transcendentals (7E ed.). Brooks/Cole.
Stewart, J., & Day, T. (2015). Biocalculus: Calculus, Probability, and Statistics for the Life Sciences.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. In Alfabeta. Alfabeta.
Susac, A., Planinic, M., Klemencic, D., & Sipus, Z. M. (2018). Using the Rasch model to analyze the test of understanding of vectors. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 23101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.023101
Taqwa, M. R. A., & Rahim, H. F. (2022). Students’ conceptual understanding on vector topic in visual and mathematical representation: A comparative study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2309(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012060
Weir, M. D., & Hass, J. (2014). Thomas’ Calculus. Pearson.
Whelan, E. T., Ray, T. P., Kattnig, D. R., Nielsen, C., & Abyaneh, M. Y. (2021). Classical test theory and Rasch analysis of test of understanding of vectors ( TUV ) Classical test theory and Rasch analysis of test of understanding of vectors ( TUV ). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1719/1/012089
Zavala, G., & Barniol, P. (2013). Students’ understanding of dot product as a projection in no-context, work and electric flux problems. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1513(August 2014), 438–441. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789746
Copyright (c) 2023 Kimura Patar Tamba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
2. The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internasional License
