Validasi Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) Versi Bahasa Indonesia dengan Rasch Model
Article Sidebar
Published:
Apr 22, 2020
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to validate the Indonesian version of the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) using the Rasch Model. Indicator of Phubbing is (1) Nomophobia, (2) Interpersonal conflict, (3) Self Isolation, and (4) Problem Acknowledgement. The research sample of 379 UNNES students consisted of 106 men and 273 women taken randomly from 8 faculties. The results of this study indicate that the Generic Scale of Phubbing has a respondent reliability index (α = 0.07), item reliability (α = 1.00). Based on these findings, the GSP instrument can be used to measure phubbing behavior for students. To get broader benefits, the use of GSP needs to be followed up by continuing development both in terms of writing statement items, number of statement items, the content of statements to the subject used in accordance with Indonesian culture.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Isrofin, B. (2020). Validasi Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) Versi Bahasa Indonesia dengan Rasch Model. Nusantara of Research : Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri, 7(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.29407/nor.v7i1.13883
Issue
Section
Artikel
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
Amelia, T., Despitasari, M., Sari, K., Putri, D. S. K., Oktamianti, P., & Agustina, A. (2019). Phubbing, Penyebab Dan Dampaknya Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Indonesia. Jurnal Ekologi Kesehatan, 18(2), 122-134.
Buckle, C. (2016). Mobiles seen as most important device. Retrieved from (online) http://www.globalwebindex.net/blog/mobiles-seen-as-most-important-device.
Bond, T.G., & Fox, C. (2007). Applying the rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum.
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current directions in psychological science, 16(6), 351-355.
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12506.
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018.
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Measuring phone snubbing behavior: Development and validation of the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) and the Generic Scale of Being Phubbed (GSBP). Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 5-17.
Digital. (2020) Pengguna Internet Indonesia dalam Angka. Di akses pada 01 September 2020, dari https://cyberthreat.id/read/5387/Digital-2020-Pengguna-Internet-Indonesia-dalam-Angka.
Dwyer, R. J., Kushlevb, K., & Dunn, E. W. (2017). Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 233-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.007.
Fauzan, A. (2018) A. Analisis psikometrik instrumen phubbing dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya (Bachelor's thesis, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Fakultas Psikologi.
Youarti, I.E. and Hidayah, N. (2018). “Perilaku Phubbing Sebagai Karakter Remaja Generasi Z” Jurnal Fokus Konseling, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 27–36.
Hanika, I.M. (2015). “Fenomena Phubbing di Era milinea (ketergantungan seseorang pada smartphone terhadap lingkungannya),” Jurnal Interaksi., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 42–51.
Karadag, E., Tosuntas, S. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Sahin, B. M., & Babadag, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 60-74. doi:10.1556/2006.4.2015.005.
Kwon, M., Kim, D. J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS one, 8(12), e83558.
M.B. Acat, G. (2010). Tüken, and E. Karadağ, “The Scale of Scientific Epistemological Beliefs: Adapting for Turkish Culture, Language Validity and Examination of Factor Structure”. Jurnal Turkish Sci. Educ., Vol. 7, no. 4, p. 60.
McCann. (2018). Phubbing - a word is born | McCANN Australia. Retrieved October 9, 2018, from https://mccann.com.au/project/phubbing-a-word-is-born/.
Misra, S., Cheng, L., & Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2014). The iPhone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of telepon selulers. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 1–24. doi: 10.1177/0013916514539755.
David, M.E. & J.A. Roberts. (2017) “Phubbed and Alone: Phone Snubbing, Social Exclusion, and Attachment to Social Media,” J. Assoc. Consum. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 155–163.
Mulawarman, M., Binti, I., Afriyadi, S. (2020). Application of RASCH Models to Validate Emotional Intelligence Inventory (EII) in High School Students. Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar on Guidance and Counseling 2019 (ISGC 2019). Oktober 14-15th. Yogyakarta: Faculty of Education, State University of Yogyakarta.
Nazir, T., & Pişkin, M. (2016). Phubbing: A Technological Invasion Which Connected the World But Disconnected Humans. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(4), 2348–5396. Retrieved from http://www.ijip.in.
Prasetyo. (2017). Hubungan antara kecanduan gadget (smartphone) dengan empati pada mahasiswa fakultas psikologi universitas muhammadiyah surakarta. Surakarta: UMS.
Q. Dai. (2016). “Gender, Grade and Personality Differences in Internet Addiction and Positive Psychological Health among Chinese College Students,” Prim. Heal. Care Open Access, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–6.
Ranie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. Pew Research Center. August, 2015. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-onmobile-etiquette/.
Rangka, I. B., Prasetyaningtyas, W. E., Satrianta, H., & Folastri, S. (2017). Profil Perencanaan Karir Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan dengan Pemodelan Rasch Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin. Konselor, 6(2), 39-48.
Rangka, I. B., Prasetyaningtyas, W. E., Ifdil, I., Ardi, Z., Suranata, K., Winingsih, E., ... & Wijaya, R. S. (2018). Measuring psychometric properties of the Indonesian version of the NoMoPhobia Questionnaire (NMPQ): insight from Rasch measurement tool. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1114, No. 1, p. 012127). IOP Publishing.
Reza, I. F. (2018). Dimensions of phubbing among moslem adolescents in revolution industry 4.0: Perspectif mental health. IcomethNCP, (PROCEEDING of International Conference of Mental Health, Neuroscience, and Cyberpsychology), 62–70. doi: 10.32698/25259.
Samaha, M., & Hawi, N. S. (2016). Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 321-325.
S.T. T’ng, K.H. Ho, and S.K. Low. (2018) “Are you ‘phubbing’ me? The Determinants of Phubbing Behavior and Assessment of Measurement Invariance across Sex Differences,” Int. Multidiscip. J. Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 159.
Thaeras, F. (2017). www.cnnindonesia.com. Diambil kembali dari CNN Indonesia: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/gaya-hidup/20170714134144- 277-227920/phubbing- fenomena-sosial-yang-merusak-hubungan.
Vanden Abeele, M.L. Antheunis, and A.P. Schouten. (2016). “The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 62, pp. 562–569.
Wahyudi, A. (2015). Indonesia raksasa teknologi digital asia. Diunduh dari http://www.tempo.co/read/kolom/2015/10/02/2310/indonesia-raksasa-teknologi- digitalasia.
Wibisono, S. (2019). Aplikasi model rasch untuk validasi instrumen pengukuran fundamentalisme agama bagi responden muslim. JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia), 3(3).
Buckle, C. (2016). Mobiles seen as most important device. Retrieved from (online) http://www.globalwebindex.net/blog/mobiles-seen-as-most-important-device.
Bond, T.G., & Fox, C. (2007). Applying the rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum.
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current directions in psychological science, 16(6), 351-355.
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12506.
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018.
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Measuring phone snubbing behavior: Development and validation of the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) and the Generic Scale of Being Phubbed (GSBP). Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 5-17.
Digital. (2020) Pengguna Internet Indonesia dalam Angka. Di akses pada 01 September 2020, dari https://cyberthreat.id/read/5387/Digital-2020-Pengguna-Internet-Indonesia-dalam-Angka.
Dwyer, R. J., Kushlevb, K., & Dunn, E. W. (2017). Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 233-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.007.
Fauzan, A. (2018) A. Analisis psikometrik instrumen phubbing dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya (Bachelor's thesis, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Fakultas Psikologi.
Youarti, I.E. and Hidayah, N. (2018). “Perilaku Phubbing Sebagai Karakter Remaja Generasi Z” Jurnal Fokus Konseling, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 27–36.
Hanika, I.M. (2015). “Fenomena Phubbing di Era milinea (ketergantungan seseorang pada smartphone terhadap lingkungannya),” Jurnal Interaksi., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 42–51.
Karadag, E., Tosuntas, S. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Sahin, B. M., & Babadag, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 60-74. doi:10.1556/2006.4.2015.005.
Kwon, M., Kim, D. J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS one, 8(12), e83558.
M.B. Acat, G. (2010). Tüken, and E. Karadağ, “The Scale of Scientific Epistemological Beliefs: Adapting for Turkish Culture, Language Validity and Examination of Factor Structure”. Jurnal Turkish Sci. Educ., Vol. 7, no. 4, p. 60.
McCann. (2018). Phubbing - a word is born | McCANN Australia. Retrieved October 9, 2018, from https://mccann.com.au/project/phubbing-a-word-is-born/.
Misra, S., Cheng, L., & Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2014). The iPhone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of telepon selulers. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 1–24. doi: 10.1177/0013916514539755.
David, M.E. & J.A. Roberts. (2017) “Phubbed and Alone: Phone Snubbing, Social Exclusion, and Attachment to Social Media,” J. Assoc. Consum. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 155–163.
Mulawarman, M., Binti, I., Afriyadi, S. (2020). Application of RASCH Models to Validate Emotional Intelligence Inventory (EII) in High School Students. Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar on Guidance and Counseling 2019 (ISGC 2019). Oktober 14-15th. Yogyakarta: Faculty of Education, State University of Yogyakarta.
Nazir, T., & Pişkin, M. (2016). Phubbing: A Technological Invasion Which Connected the World But Disconnected Humans. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(4), 2348–5396. Retrieved from http://www.ijip.in.
Prasetyo. (2017). Hubungan antara kecanduan gadget (smartphone) dengan empati pada mahasiswa fakultas psikologi universitas muhammadiyah surakarta. Surakarta: UMS.
Q. Dai. (2016). “Gender, Grade and Personality Differences in Internet Addiction and Positive Psychological Health among Chinese College Students,” Prim. Heal. Care Open Access, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–6.
Ranie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. Pew Research Center. August, 2015. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-onmobile-etiquette/.
Rangka, I. B., Prasetyaningtyas, W. E., Satrianta, H., & Folastri, S. (2017). Profil Perencanaan Karir Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan dengan Pemodelan Rasch Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin. Konselor, 6(2), 39-48.
Rangka, I. B., Prasetyaningtyas, W. E., Ifdil, I., Ardi, Z., Suranata, K., Winingsih, E., ... & Wijaya, R. S. (2018). Measuring psychometric properties of the Indonesian version of the NoMoPhobia Questionnaire (NMPQ): insight from Rasch measurement tool. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1114, No. 1, p. 012127). IOP Publishing.
Reza, I. F. (2018). Dimensions of phubbing among moslem adolescents in revolution industry 4.0: Perspectif mental health. IcomethNCP, (PROCEEDING of International Conference of Mental Health, Neuroscience, and Cyberpsychology), 62–70. doi: 10.32698/25259.
Samaha, M., & Hawi, N. S. (2016). Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 321-325.
S.T. T’ng, K.H. Ho, and S.K. Low. (2018) “Are you ‘phubbing’ me? The Determinants of Phubbing Behavior and Assessment of Measurement Invariance across Sex Differences,” Int. Multidiscip. J. Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 159.
Thaeras, F. (2017). www.cnnindonesia.com. Diambil kembali dari CNN Indonesia: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/gaya-hidup/20170714134144- 277-227920/phubbing- fenomena-sosial-yang-merusak-hubungan.
Vanden Abeele, M.L. Antheunis, and A.P. Schouten. (2016). “The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 62, pp. 562–569.
Wahyudi, A. (2015). Indonesia raksasa teknologi digital asia. Diunduh dari http://www.tempo.co/read/kolom/2015/10/02/2310/indonesia-raksasa-teknologi- digitalasia.
Wibisono, S. (2019). Aplikasi model rasch untuk validasi instrumen pengukuran fundamentalisme agama bagi responden muslim. JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia), 3(3).