A Preliminary Study on the Development and Validation of an Academic Buoyancy Instrument for Final Year Students

Main Article Content

Retno Fajarwati
Wardani Utami Dewi
Binti Isrofin
Muhammad Naim Almarham

Abstract

Undertaking an undergraduate thesis is a demanding academic phase frequently accompanied by stress and anxiety, underscoring the importance of academic buoyancy, the capacity to deal with everyday academic setbacks. This preliminary study aimed to develop an academic buoyancy instrument for final-year students based on the 5C framework (confidence, coordination, control, composure, and commitment) and to conduct an initial psychometric evaluation through expert judgment, item-total correlation analysis, and internal consistency estimation. Following Azwar's scale development stages, an initial pool of 25 Likert-type items was reviewed by two experts; Content validity was rated highly feasible (subject expert 96%, language expert 86%; mean 91%). The instrument was administered to 104 students writing or about to write their theses. Item-total correlations ranged from 0.103 to 0.495; 24 items met the criteria (p < 0.05) and one item (i3) was removed. The final 24 item set yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.742, adequate for an early stage instrument and a basis for further validation rather than high-stakes individual decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Artikel

How to Cite

Fajarwati, R., Dewi, W. U., Isrofin, B., & Almarham, M. N. (2026). A Preliminary Study on the Development and Validation of an Academic Buoyancy Instrument for Final Year Students. Nusantara of Research : Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri, 13(2), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.29407/nor.v13i2.28517

References

Azwar, S. (2012). Compilation of psychological scales (Edition 2). Yogyakarta: Student Library.

Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., & Martin, A. J. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates: A systematic review. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 9(2), 189-212.

Bisschop, J. (2007). Reliability methods and standards. Microelectronics Reliability, 47(9-11), 1330-1335.

Chen, M., Liu, S., Wijaya, T. T., & Cao, Y. (2025). Influence of family socioeconomic status on academic buoyancy and adaptability: Mediating effect of parental involvement. Acta psychologica, 253, 104753.

Chen, S., & Zhang, L.-F. (2025). Academic buoyancy and self-regulated learning among doctoral students: The mediating roles of creativity-generating research styles. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 58, 101900.

Collie, R. J., Holliman, A. J., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Adaptability, engagement and academic achievement at university. Educational Psychology, 37(5), 632-647.

Cornér, S., Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2017). The relationship between doctoral students' perceptions of supervision and burnout. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 91-106.

Dang, A. H., & Middlemiss, W. (2025). Academic buoyancy and fear of failure differences among university students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101184.

Gao, F. (2025). Academic buoyancy and achievement among EFL learners: The mediating roles of hope and enjoyment. Acta Psychologica, 260, 105595.

Lu, Y., Li, F., Gao, C., Zhu, X., & Lian, L. (2025). Enhancing student satisfaction through academic buoyancy and flow experience. Acta Psychologica, 256, 104983.

Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students' everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46(1), 53-83.

Martin, A. J., Colmar, S. H., Davey, L. A., & Marsh, H. W. (2010). Longitudinal modelling of academic buoyancy and motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 473-496.

Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., Brackett, M. A., Malmberg, L. E., & Hall, J. (2013). Academic buoyancy and psychological risk: Exploring reciprocal relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 128-133.

Namaziandost, E., & Çelik, B. (2025). Academic buoyancy, engagement, and achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1357421.

Peluso, D. L., Carleton, R. N., & Asmundson, G. J. (2011). Depression symptoms in Canadian psychology graduate students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 43(2), 119-127.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Quantitative analysis of research instruments. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Setiana, S., Taufik, A., Rusmana, N., & Nurihsan, J. (2023). Development and validation of student social adjustment instruments. GUIDENA, 13(4), 1089-1100.

Sitompul, M. R. (2021). Reliability and validity of construct academic buoyancy in Indonesia. Humanities, 5(3), 389-397.

Soysa, C. K., & Wilcomb, C. J. (2015). Mindfulness, self-compassion, self-efficacy, and gender as predictors of well-being. Mindfulness, 6(2), 217-226.

Sverdlik, A., Hall, N. C., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students' completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361-388.

Yau, O. K. T., Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., & Collie, R. J. (2025). Gender differences in academic buoyancy: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 121, 102700.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.