Pegawai Loyal Sebagai Pelaku Fraud : Perspektif Hexagonal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29407/nusamba.v10i2.25206Keywords:
Loyalitas Pegawai, Fraud, Teori HexagonalAbstract
Research Objectives : This research focuses on the analysis of loyal employees as fraud perpetrators: a hexagonal perspective.
Design / Method / Approach : A qualitative, case-study approach focused on a state-owned bank in East Java.
Search results : The search results of 6 indicators are 4 indicators that affect the performance of loyal employees in committing fraudulent acts, namely pressure, ability, opportunities and rationalization.
Theoretical contribution/originality : This study shows that employees who are loyal in committing fraud by utilizing their skills and experience on the job and the average employee who performs this action are employees of high standing such as managers and branch heads who have the ability to obtain higher education as they do by neglecting the duties and authority of management so that they do not work effectively in terms of combating fraud.
Practical implications : This analysis is used to analyze fraud that occurs in loyal employees.
Research limitations : The limitations of this study use the hexagonal perspective only.
Downloads
References
[1] Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Hexagon Fraud: Detection of Fraudulent Financial Reporting in State-Owned Enterprises Indonesia. Economies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010013
[2] Amar, T., & Iskandar, D. (2023). ANALISIS PENGARUH FRAUD HEXAGON TERHADAP FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Studi Empiris pada perusahaan sektor Basic Material yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2018 – 2021).
[3] Christian, N. (2022). EFEK MEDIASI KESULITAN KEUANGAN DALAM MENDETEKSI CORPORATE FRAUD DI INDONESIA. In Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi (Vol. 6, Issue 1). http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/jka
[4] Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
[5] Kurniawan, D. (n.d.). Peran Good Corporate Governance terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan: Perspektif Fraud Pentagon pada Kementerian dan Lembaga Pemerintah. In Maret 2023 (Vol. 21, Issue 1). http://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/kompartemen/
[6] Lisa Zahara, A., & Ratnawati, D. (2024). FRAUD HEXAGON ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD IN MINING COMPANIES LISTED ON THE INDONESIAN STOCK EXCHANGE FOR THE PERIOD 2019-2022. COSTING:Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting, Volume 7 Nomor 4.
[7] Ria Prasasti, A., & Sri Lastanti, H. (2024). Analisis Fraud Hexagon dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting pada Perusahaan Jasa Kesehatan yang Terdaftar di BE Tahun. 5, 3.
[8] Sasmita, T., Puspitasari, R., & Rosita, S. I. (2021). Pengaruh 5C Dan 7P Dalam Pemberian Kredit. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis Kesatuan, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.37641/jabkes.v1i1.562
[9] sasongko, N., & Fitriana Wijayantika, S. (2019). Faktor Resiko Fraud Terhadap Pelaksanaan Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Berdasarkan Pendekatan Crown’s Fraud Pentagon Theory). Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 4 No.1 April 2019.
[10] Setiawati, E., & Mar Baningrum, R. (2018). DETEKSI FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS FRAUD PENTAGON : STUDI KASUS PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG LISTED DI BEI TAHUN 2014-2016.
[11] Sholikatun, R., & Makaryanawati, M. (2023). DETERMINAN KECURANGAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN (PERSPEKTIF FRAUD HEXAGON THEORY). EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 7(3), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2023.v7.i3.5484
[12] Silverstone, H., & Sheetz, M. (n.d.). Forensic Accounting and Fraud Investigation for Non-Experts SECOND EDITION.
[13] Sri Rahayu, N., Salam, A. D., & Achmad Rakim, A. (2023). Kualitas Sistem Informasi Akuntansi, Keamanan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi, dan Pengendalian Internal Perusahaan pada Bank BJB Syariah Cabang Cirebon. In Journal of Sharia Accounting and Tax (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
[14] Theotama, G., Denny Waskita, Y., Nugrahesthy, A., & Hapsari, S. (2023). Fraud hexagon in the motives to commit academic fraud. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 26(1), 195–220.
[15] Vousinas, Georgios. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 372-381. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128.
[16] Warren, J. (2024). OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD 2024: A REPORT TO THE NATIONS.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ika Anggie Wiasti, Driana Leniwati, Ahmad Juanda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
How to Cite
