Analisis Validasi Keterampilan Komunikasi Dan Argumentasi Siswa Biologi SMA Kelas XI MIPA

  • Wiwin Wulansari
  • Mumun Nurmilawati Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri
  • Budhi Utami Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri
  • Eko Budi Christiono SMAN 1 Grogol
Abstract views: 551 , PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 964
Keywords: Communication and argumentation skills

Abstract

In Indonesia, 21st century education has 4 skills, namely creative thinking, critical thinking, collaboration, and communication skills. 21st Century skills are applied through the K-13 curriculum which requires students to be active in learning. It is expected that students will be able to have 21st century skills including communication and argumentation skills. Communication skills are important for students to help convey, listen and understand the meaning of knowledge, values, attitudes and attention. Argumentation skills are important for students to help them argue rationally, so that other people can accept these opinions. Instruments of communication and argumentation skills of students are made as a tool to measure student skills, and instrument of validation makes it easier to collect data with the results more complete, good, systematic and easy to process. The research instrument used was an instrument of communication skills and student argumentation. This study aims to determine the validation criteria of communication skills and argumentation instruments for biology students of XI MIPA high school students. The method used is descriptive method. Based on the data obtained from the research results showed that the level of validation based on the experts of communication skills and argumentation of biology students in class XI MIPA high school including the criteria of Good (B) with a value of 25, whereas according to practitioners the communication skills and argumentation instruments of class XI MIPA high school students including the criteria of Very Good (SB) with a value of 26.

References

Aedi, Nur. 2010. Instrumen Penelitian dan Pengumpulan data. ejournal.upi.edu. 5 (2) : 6 – 8.

Agusni, Hendika Prasetyo. 2017. Pengaruh Skill Argumentasi Menggunakan ModelPembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL)Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP. Jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id. 5 (10) :24 – 25.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Devi Cahya, N. D., Susanti, Elvi. dan Indriyanti, N. Y. 2018. Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa SMA Pada Materi Larutan Penyangga. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia). 3 (3) : 152 – 159.

Kemendikbud. 2016. Seminar Education Transformation and 21st Century Learning di Graha Utama. URL:https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2016/01/teknologiinfomasi-dan-komunikasipenting-untukproses-pembelajaran-masa kini.Diakses pada 6 Desember 2019

Marfuah. 2017. Meningkatkan Keterampilan Komunikasi Peserta Didik melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial (JPIS). 26 (2) : 149 – 159.

Noviyanti, M. 2017. Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP Kanisius Gayam Yogyakarta Kelas VII C dalam Konteks Operasi Hitung Bentuk Aljabar. Jurnal repository.usd.ac.id. 3 (2) : 50 – 60.

Retnawati, Heri. 2016. Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian). Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Riyani, Rizki., Maizora, Syafdi., dan Hanifah. 2017. Uji Validitas Pengembangan Tes Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Pemahaman Relasional Pada Materi Persamaan Kuadrat Siswa Kelas VIII SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS). 1 (1) : 1 – 6.

Wahyuni, Ari. 2013. Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa.respository.ump.ac.id. 7 (1) : 7 – 32.

Wardah, Faiqotul. 2018. Pengembangan Instrumen Authentic Assessment Berupa Penilaian Proyek Untuk Mengukur Kompetensi Keterampilan Siswa. Jurnalpai.uinsby.ac.id. 6 (2) : 38 – 40.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2020-06-29
How to Cite
Wulansari, W., Nurmilawati, M., Utami, B., & Christiono, E. B. (2020). Analisis Validasi Keterampilan Komunikasi Dan Argumentasi Siswa Biologi SMA Kelas XI MIPA. Efektor, 7(1), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.29407/e.v7i1.14340

Most read articles by the same author(s)