Literacy dimension in physical education: analysis of construct validity instrument
PDF
Similiarity Check

Keywords

Literacy
Physical education
Construct validity

How to Cite

Literacy dimension in physical education: analysis of construct validity instrument. (2021). Jurnal SPORTIF : Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran, 7(2), 303-316. https://doi.org/10.29407/js_unpgri.v7i2.16251

Abstract

This research aims to test the dimension of literacy in physical education in students at Singaperbangsa Karawang University. Research is conducted using quantitative approaches with survey methods. The population in this study was all student-athletes in various sports at Singaperbangsa Karawang University which amounted to 721 people. The study sample was determined using proportional random sampling techniques totalling 342 people. The dimensions of physical literacy used are the dimensions of variation and utilization of books (BK), dimensions of variation and use of scientific articles (WM), dimensions of variation and utilization of technology (TECH), and dimensions of environmental variation (LK) . Data analysis used is Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with Second-Order Confirmation Factor (SOCF) with Lisrel program version 8.80. Data analysis showed that the literacy scale developed for physical learning is a valid and reliable scale and consists of 15 indicators. The dimension of variety and use of writing materials is the most dominant in shaping college student literacy.

PDF
Similiarity Check

References

Abildsnes, E., Stea, T. H., Berntsen, S., Omfjord, C. S., & Rohde, G. (2015). Physical education Teachers ’ and public health Nurses ’ perception of Norwegian high school Students ’ participation in physical education – a focus group study. BMC Public Health, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2660-y

Baskarada, S. (2014). Qualitative Case Study Guidelines. Hcas Journals, 19(40), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1008

Basoglu, U. D. (2018). The Importance of Physical Literacy for Physical Education and Recreation. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(4), 139. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i4.3022

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98

Dinham, J., & Williams, P. (2019). Developing children’s physical literacy: How well prepared are prospective teachers? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(6), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v44n6.4

Durmus, E., & Kinaci, M. K. (2021). Opinions of Social Studies Teacher Education Students about the Impact of Environmental Education on Ecological Literacy. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(2), 482–501. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.825516

Dynia, J. M., Schachter, R. E., Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., O’Connell, A. A., & Yeager Pelatti, C. (2018). An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the physical literacy environment in early childhood classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 18(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798416652448

Edwards, L. C., Bryant, A. S., Keegan, R. J., Morgan, K., & Jones, A. M. (2017). Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review. Sports Medicine, 47(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7

Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability Estimation in a Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis Framework. 19(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032138

Giblin, S., Collins, D., & Button, C. (2014). Physical literacy: Importance, assessment and future directions. Sports Medicine, 44(9), 1177–1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0205-7

Gustian, U. (2020). Permainan tradisional: suatu pendekatandalam mengembangkanphysical literacysiswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal SPORTIF : Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran, 6(1), 199–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29407/js_unpgri.v6i1.14252

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (Seventh Ed). Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351269360

Kanca, I. N. (2018). Menjadi Guru Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga Dan Kesehatan Di Abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional IPTEK Olahraga, 21–27.

Korkmaz, F. (2016). Developing the Scale of Teacher Self-Efficacy in Teaching Process. European Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.5.2.73

Li, M. H., Sum, R. K. W., Tremblay, M., Sit, C. H. P., Ha, A. S. C., & Wong, S. H. S. (2020). Cross-validation of the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy second edition (CAPL-2): The case of a Chinese population. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(24), 2850–2857. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1803016

Neibert, P. J. (2013). Note : This article will be published in a forthcoming issue of the Journal of Sport Rehabilitation . The article appears here in its accepted , peer-reviewed form , as it was provided by the submitting author . It has not been copyedited , proofed , or f.

Nugroho, K. A., Kristiyanto, A., Doewes, M., Sebelas, U., Jalan, M., Sutami, I., & Surakarta, K. (2018). Implementasi pendidikan jasmani dalam international primary curriculum. 6(36), 110–119.

Nunez, M. B., & Clores, M. A. (2017). Environmental Literacy of K – 10 Student Completers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(5), 1195–1215.

Nurkholis. (2013). PENDIDIKAN DALAM UPAYA MEMAJUKAN TEKNOLOGI Oleh: Nurkholis Doktor Ilmu Pendidikan, Alumnus Universitas Negeri Jakarta Dosen Luar Biasa Jurusan Tarbiyah STAIN Purwokerto. 1(1), 24–44.

Park, Y. (2017). Examining South Korea ’ s Elementary Physical Education Performance Assessment Using Assessment Literacy Perspectives. 10(2). https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017236116

Pasaribu, A. M. N. (2016). Pengaruh Gaya Mengajar dan Motivasi Belajar Passing Bawah dalam Permainan Bola Voli pada Siswa SMP Kelas VIII Tahun 2013/2011114. Jurnal Sportif, 2(2), 76–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29407/js_unpgri.v2i2.510

Philippi, C. L. (2020). Valid for What? On the Very Idea of Unconditional Validity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 51(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393120971169

Retnawati, H. (2016). Validitas dan Reliabilitas & Karakteristik Butir. Parama Publishing.

Roetert, E. P., & Couturier, L. (2015). ScienceDirect Unpacking the physical literacy concept for K-12 physical education : What should we expect the learner to master ? Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2015.03.002

Roetert, E. P., & Jefferies, S. C. (2014). Embracing Physical Literacy. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 85(8), 38–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2014.948353

Roetert, E. P., & MacDonald, L. C. (2015). Unpacking the physical literacy concept for K-12 physical education: Whatshould we expect the learner to master? Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2015.03.002

Scott, J. J., Hill, S., Barwood, D., & Penney, D. (2021). Physical literacy and policy alignment in sport and education in Australia. European Physical Education Review, 27(2), 328–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X20947434

Thota, N., & Berglund, A. (2016). Learning computer science: Dimensions of variation within what Chinese students learn. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/2853199

Tremblay, M., & Lloyd, M. (2009). Physical Literacy Measurement – The Missing Piece.

Whitehead, M. (2019). Definition of Physical Literacy and Clarification of related Issues. ICSSPE Bulletin, 1.2(65), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203702697-17

Yılmaz, A., & Kabak, S. (2021). Perceived Physical Literacy Scale for Adolescents (PPLSA): Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 9(1), 159–171. http://www.journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJELS/article/view/6485

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License