Kata Kunci
student-athlete
blended learning
schoology
##submission.howToCite##
Abstrak
The purpose of this descriptive study was to evaluate the implementation of schoology-based blended learning model. This was carried out based on the quality of the model and student-athlete learning motivation in the dissemination of research and development products. Four universities were used as locations for dissemination with 59 student-athletes involved (39 male and 20 female). The model quality was measured using a questionnaire to reveal utility, feasibility, accuracy, and propriety. Meanwhile, motivation was measured using a questionnaire to reveal the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Content validity ratio (CVR) and percentage were used to analyze the model quality. The motivation data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and One-Way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results of this study showed that the validity, requirements of the model quality measurements based on utility, feasibility, accuracy, and propriety were fulfilled with an average CVR index of 0.98 and a quality value of 92% (very good). Furthermore, intrinsic, extrinsic, and total motivations were included in good categories with values of 47.3, 67.1, and 114.4, respectively. In addition, student-athlete motivation by region (F (3, 55) = 0.451, p = 0.718), gender (t (57) = 0.714, p = 0.478), and type of sport (t (57) = 0.531, p = 0.597) were the same. Therefore, this implies that the schoology-based blended learning model maintained a motivational climate for student-athletes in a variety of conditions and backgrounds.
Referensi
Alahmed, M. I., Yusof, A., Saidon, A., Borhannudin, A., & Prihadi, K. (2017). Moderation role of attitude on the relationship between participation in competitive sports and academic performance of student-athletes in Saudi Arabia. IFMBE Proceedings, 58, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3737-5_5
Asikin, M. N. (2020, June 5). Sambut New Normal, Kemendikbud Siapkan Super Aplikasi Pendidikan. https://www.jawapos.com/nasional/pendidikan/05/06/2020/sambut-new-normal-kemendikbud-siapkan-super-aplikasi-pendidikan/
Atmacasoy, A., & Aksu, M. (2018). Blended learning at pre-service teacher education in Turkey: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2399–2422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9723-5
Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
Best, M., & MacGregor, D. (2017). Transitioning Design and Technology Education from physical classrooms to virtual spaces: implications for pre-service teacher education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9350-z
Boelens, R., Voet, M., & De Wever, B. (2018). The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors’ views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learning. Computers & Education, 120, 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2018.02.009
Burstiando, R. (2015). Peningkatkan Motivasi Intrinsik dan Ekstrinsik Melalui Sport Education Model pada Permainan Bolabasket. Jurnal Sportif, 1(1), 60–73. https://ojs.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/pjk/article/download/571/429/
Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2523–2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3
Chen, A. (2015). Operationalizing physical literacy for learners: Embodying the motivation to move. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSHS.2015.03.005
Fajar WH. (2020, May 31). Mengenal Konsep New Normal | Indonesia.go.id. https://indonesia.go.id/ragam/komoditas/ekonomi/mengenal-konsep-new-normal
Gaol, F. L., & Hutagalung, F. (2020). The trends of blended learning in South East Asia. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 25, Issue 2, pp. 659–663). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10140-4
Granero-Gallegos, A., Gómez-López, M., Rodríguez-Suárez, N., Arturo Abraldes, J., Alesi, M., & Bianco, A. (2017). Importance of the motivational climate in goal, enjoyment, and the causes of success in handball players. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(DEC). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02081
Guidotti, F., Minganti, C., Cortis, C., Piacentini, M. F., Tessitore, A., & Capranica, L. (2013). Validation of the Italian version of the Student Athletes’ Motivation toward Sport and Academics Questionnaire. Sport Sciences for Health, 9(2), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-013-0145-x
Guntoro, T. S., Kurdi, K., & Putra, M. F. P. (2020). Karakter kepribadian atlet Papua: kajian menuju POPNAS ke-XV. Jurnal SPORTIF : Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran, 6(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.29407/js_unpgri.v6i1.13638
Handarini, D. M. (2000). Pengembangan Model Pelatihan Keterampilan Sosial bagi Siswa Sekolah Menengah Umum Terpadu. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Huba, M., & Kozák, Š. (2016). From E-learning to Industry 4.0. International Conference on Emerging ELearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA.2016.7802083
Ibrahim, H. I., Jaafar, A. H., Kassim, M. A. M., & Isa, A. (2016). Motivational Climate, Self-Confidence and Perceived Success among Student Athletes. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 503–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00062-9
Ibrahim, M. M., & Nat, M. (2019). Blended learning motivation model for instructors in higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0145-2
Kabassi, K., Dragonas, I., Ntouzevits, A., Pomonis, T., Papastathopoulos, G., & Vozaitis, Y. (2016). Evaluating a learning management system for blended learning in Greek higher education. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1705-8
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
Levine, J., Etchison, S., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). Pluralistic ignorance among student–athlete populations: a factor in academic underperformance. Higher Education, 68(4), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9726-0
Li, Y., Yang, H. H., Cai, J., & MacLeod, J. (2017). College students’ computer self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, attitude, and satisfaction in blended learning environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10309 LNCS, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59360-9_6
Lim, C. P., Wang, T., & Graham, C. (2019). Driving, sustaining and scaling up blended learning practices in higher education institutions: a proposed framework. Innovation and Education, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42862-019-0002-0
Maksum, A. (2018). Statistik dalam Olahraga. Unesa University Press.
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G. C., & Guarino, A. J. (2013). Performing Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Pedescleaux, J. (2010). Motivation factors as indicators of academic achievement: A comparative study of student-athletes and non-athletes academic and social motivation [University of Northern Iowa]. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1562&context=etd
Priambodo, A., Hariyanto, A., & Dinata, V. C. (2020). The Development of Schoology-Based Blended Learning Model to Improve Student Motivation of National Training Center (PELATNAS) Athlete. 334–338. https://doi.org/10.2991/ahsr.k.200214.089
Priambodo, A., Hariyanto, A., Dinata, V. C., Ristianto, K. O., & Prakoso, B. B. (2020). Learning Need Assessment: Formulating Blended-Learning as Academic Services for Student-Athletes. 217–220. https://doi.org/10.2991/icracos-19.2020.46
Riciputi, S., & Erdal, K. (2017). The effect of stereotype threat on student-athlete math performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 32, 54–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYCHSPORT.2017.06.003
Sandstedt, S. D., Cox, R. H., Martens, M. P., Ward, D. G., Webber, S. N., & Ivey, S. (2004). Development of the Student-Athlete Career Situation Inventory (SACSI). Journal of Career Development, 31(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10871-004-0566-5
Sarrab, M., Al-Shihi, H., Al-Manthari, B., & Bourdoucen, H. (2018). Toward Educational Requirements Model for Mobile Learning Development and Adoption in Higher Education. TechTrends, 62(6), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0331-4
Shia, R. M. (n.d.). Academic Intrinsic 1 Running head: ACADEMIC INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION AND METACOGNITION Assessing Academic Intrinsic Motivation: A Look at Student Goals and Personal Strategy.
Suroto. (2018, July 1). Active Learning Model in Track and Field Course for Pre-service Physical Education Teacher. Proceedings of the 2nd Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Conference: Establishing Identities through Language, Culture, and Education (SOSHEC 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/soshec-18.2018.68
Tadayon, N. (2016). Evaluating Program Assessment Report. Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS), 173–178. https://search.proquest.com/openview/c0644e3fd073e62871cabf39ab4002f3/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1976352
Wuryaningsih, W., Susilastuti, D. H., Darwin, M., & Pierewan, A. C. (2019). Effects of Web-Based Learning and F2F Learning on Teachers Achievement in Teacher Training Program in Indonesia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(21), 123–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i21.10736
Yarbrough, D. B. (2017). Developing the program evaluation utility standards: Scholarly foundations and collaborative processes. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 31(3), 284–304. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.349
##submission.copyrightStatement##