Marking Meaning: EFL students’ Annotation as a Tool for Academic Literacy

Authors

  • Lungguh Halira Vonti Universitas Pakuan
  • Leora Grahadila Andovita
  • Susi Aslamiyah
  • Atti Herawati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v10i2.26567

Keywords:

academic literacy; annotation strategy; reading comprehension , academic literacy, annotation strategy

Abstract

In the context of Indonesia higher education, English academic reading poses notable challenges for EFL students, particularly due to complex language and limited instructional support. To address this issue, annotation emerges as a critical strategy to facilitate comprehension and engagement with scholarly texts. This study aims to explore the annotation practices employed by eight-semester EFL students when reading academic materials. Using a descriptive qualitative method, data were collected through documentation of annotated texts and semi-structured interviews involving six students from an English Language Education Study Program at Pakuan University. The analysis followed Marshall's framework, categorizing annotations into three types: anchor only, content only, and compound. Findings revealed that students predominantly used anchor only annotations-highlighting and underlining- to mark essential information. Some employed compound annotations by integrating text markers with reflective notes, while content only annotations were less frequent but demonstrated deeper processing through independent summaries. These practices indicate that annotation supports not only reading comprehension but also academic writing and critical engagement. The study recommends integrating explicit instruction on annotation techniques into EFL reading curricula to empower students as active readers and knowledge constructors. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract views: 96 , pdf downloads: 81

References

Anwar, I. W., &Sailuddin, S. P. (2022). Academic reading difficulties in higher education. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(2), 309–314.https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i2.4849

Bélanger, M.-E. (2010). The annotative practices of graduate students: Tensions & negotiations fostering an epistemic practice.A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Information StudiesFaculty of Information Toronto University. Retrieved from: https://utoronto.scholaris.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/332d734b-005d-4b92-852f-ea81fc0e2e83/content

Damayanti, A. (2020). Annotation Text as Strategy to Teach Reading for General Communication. A Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 3, 1–10.https://jurnal.stkippgitulungagung.ac.id/index.pho/bright/article/vied1 543

Dardjito, H., Rolls, N., Setiawan, A., &Sumekto, D. R. (2023). Challenges in reading English academic texts for non-English major students of an Indonesian university. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(3), 1290–1308.https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i3.29067

Darwin, Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2290342.https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342

Elliott, R., &Timulak, L. (2021). Essentials of descriptive-interpretive qualitative research: a generic approach. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0000224-000

Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42.https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768

Lloyd, Z. T., Kim, D., Cox, J. T., Doepker, G. M., & Downey, S. E. (2022). Using the annotating strategy to improve students’ academic achievement in social studies. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 15(2), 218–231.https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1353326

Nantke, J., &Schlupkothen, F. (2020). Annotations in Scholarly Editions and Research: Functions, Differentiation, Systematization.De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110689112

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. In Language teaching research (Vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 129–132). Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England.

Roy, N., Torre, M. V., Gadiraju, U., Maxwell, D., & Hauff, C. (2021). Note the highlight: incorporating active reading tools in a search as learning environment. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, 229–238.https://doi.org/10.1145/3406522.3446025

Wolfe, J. L. (2000). Effects of annotations on student readers and writers. Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, 19–26.https://doi.org/10.1145/336597.336620

Zhang, P. (2024). Effects of highlights and annotations on EFL learners’ Reading comprehension: an application of computer-assisted interactive reading model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–33.https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2410166?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Marking Meaning: EFL students’ Annotation as a Tool for Academic Literacy. (2025). English Education:Journal of English Teaching and Research, 10(2), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v10i2.26567