Pre-service Teachers Perspectives on English Coursebook for Senior High Schools in Indonesia

  • Fransiskus Jemadi UNIKA St Paulus Ruteng
  • Yulian Juita Ekalia
  • Leonardus Par
  • Adrianus Nabung
Abstract views: 6 , pdf downloads: 9
Keywords: Textbook evaluation; Perception; Teachers’ perceptions, Textbook evaluation

Abstract

A textbook is an inseparable part of the teaching and learning process. This research was aimed at discovering pre-service teachers’ perception of the ELT textbook, Buku Bahasa Inggris for Students grade XI. This qualitative study involved 18 pre-service teachers who were doing their teaching practicum in different senior high schools in Manggarai, East Nusa Tenggara Province. They were chosen purposefully by the researchers and voluntarily engaged in semi-structured interviews to discover their perspectives on the English textbook they used during their teaching practicum. The results showed that they had mixed opinions about their textbooks, ranging from positive to negative, depending on various factors such as their learning objectives, preferences, expectations, and experiences. The observations and conclusions from this study may be useful for educators and coursebook designers in developing English coursebooks that can improve students' motivation, engagement and language learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Arfiandhani, P. (2016). Evaluating The CLT-Ness Of Bahasa Inggris Untuk SMA/MA/SMK/MAK Kelas X Semester 1 Coursebook For Secondary School Students In Indonesia. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 26-38.
2. Awasthi, J. R., Sharma, K. C., Dahala, H. R., Pathak, L. S., & Poudel, K. (2006). Textbook and its evaluation. Journal of NELTA, 11(1-2), 1-10.
3. Bahman, M., &Rahimi. 2010. Gender Representation n EFL Materials: an analysis of English textbooks of Iranian high school. ScienceDirect Journal Volume 9/273-277.Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences
4. Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and practice. Pearson Education.
5. Cameron, D. 1985. Feminism and Linguistic Theory. London: Macmillan.
6. Cunningsworth, A. (1995) Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann English Language Teaching.
7. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. 2012. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (Eight Edition). New York: McGram-Hill Companies.
8. Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change.
9. Karsudianto, F. (2019). An evaluation of an English coursebook †œWhen English Rings The Bellâ€. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (JELTIM), 1(2), 81-86.
10. Kim, Y., & McDonough, S. H. (2012). The effects of cultural information in EFL textbooks on Korean EFL learners' cultural awareness and understanding of real-life contexts. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 53-73.
11. Le, T., Le, M., & Nguyen, Q. (2021). EFL Teachers' Evaluation on “Skillful-Teaching Writing and Reading 02”. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(3), 398-417.
12. Lee, L., & Huang, J. (2010). The effect of interactive and engaging activities on EFL learners' motivation and learning outcomes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(1), 1-12.
13. Mahmood, K. (2009). Indicators for a quality textbook evaluation process in Pakistan. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 3(2), 158–176. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9637/9ef32504c010d596e7319fea023efefc75d8.pdf. Search in Google Scholar
14. Mills, S. (1995). Feminist stylistic. London: Routledge.
15. Nimehchisalem, V., & Mukundan, J. (2015). Refinement of the English Language Teaching Textbook Evaluation Checklist. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 23(4).
16. Purnomowulan, S. (2014). Content analysis of an English textbook entitled Bahasa Inggris “When English Rings a Bell”. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya.
17. Reid, G., Soler, J., & Wearmouth, J. (2014). Contextualising difficulties in literacy development: exploring politics, culture, ethnicity and ethics. Routledge.
18. Richards, J. C. (2001). The Role of Textbooks in Language Program. Cambridge University Press.
19. Satriani, I., & Resmini, S. (2021). ESP Coursebook Evaluation: Students’ Perception on Activities and Tasks. ELT in Focus, 4(1), 20-25.
20. Setiawan, W. (2021). Evaluation On An English Coursebook In Online Learning: Voices From Teachers. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(2), 453-462.
21. Solangi & Memon (2020). Evalution of ‘English for Undergraduates’- a course-book for English Language Teaching at University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan from Teachers' Perspectives. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences; Vol 10, No 22 (2020); 60-69 (2020-12-04) [link]: https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RHSS/article/view/54910
22. Solhi, M., Meryem, S. A. K., Şahin, Ş., & YILMAZ, S. (2020). Evaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(3), 1282-1308.
23. Supriyanto, N. H. (2019). An Evaluation Of English Coursebook For Young Learners Entitled English Chest. Magister Scientiae, 2(46), 145-182.
24. Tomlinson, B. (ed.) (1998) Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Tomlinson, B. (2016). The importance of materials development for language learning. In Issues in materials development (pp. 1-9). Brill Sense.
26. Tomlinson, B. (2013). Introduction: Are materials developing? In B. Tomlinson (Eds.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 1-17). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
27. Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2013). Adult coursebooks. ELT Journal, 67(2), 233-249.
28. Tyas, P. A., & Safitri, M. (2019). An Analysis of English Textbook Entitled" Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA SMK/MAK Kelas X". JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 4(1), 17-22.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2024-10-31
How to Cite
Jemadi, F., Juita Ekalia, Y., Par, L., & Nabung, A. (2024). Pre-service Teachers Perspectives on English Coursebook for Senior High Schools in Indonesia . English Education:Journal of English Teaching and Research, 9(2), 140-147. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v9i2.21540