Meningkatkan Daya Saing UMK: Mengungkap Peran Kecepatan Inovasi dan Penciptaan Pengetahuan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29407/nusamba.v10i2.22631Keywords:
MSEs, Competitiveness, Innovation Speed, Knowledge Creation, Culinary IndustryAbstract
Research aim : This study investigates the critical role of innovation speed and knowledge creation as antecedents of the competitiveness of MSEs in the culinary industry.
Design/Method/Approach : Employing a multiple regression analysis, this study analyze data from 110 MSEs in Sleman and Yogyakarta.
Research Finding : Our findings reveal that both, innovation speed and knowledge creation are significant drivers of MSEs’ competitiveness.
Theoretical contribution/Originality : Building on the concept of knowledge-based barriers to entry, this study succeeded in demonstrating that rapid innovation fosters the creation of unique competence and market-based knowledge.
Practitioner/Policy implication : These results offer valuable insights for MSEs, highlighting the importance of fostering a culture of continuous innovation and knowledge creation to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage.
Research limitation : This study has limitations in the context of the sample and location, which were specifically conducted in Yogyakarta and Sleman, which may limit the generalizability of the result of this study.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Abstract views: 255 , pdf downloads: 50
References
[1] Kessler, E. H., & Bierly, P. E. (2002). Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implications of innovation speed. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 49(1), 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.985742.
[2] Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge management research & practice, 1(1), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500001.
[3] Khoa, V. D, & Anh, N. T. M. (2023). Examining the Relationship Between Supply Chain Integration, Innovation Speed and Supply Chain Performance Under Demand Uncertainty. Engineering Management Journal, 36(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2023.2174766.
[4] Jørgensen, E. J., & Mathisen, L. (2018). Speed of innovation and proximity in a rural context: the case of a manufacturing SME. In Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Education (pp. 24-40). Edward Elgar Publishing.
[5] Shan, P., Song, M., & Ju, X. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance: Is innovation speed a missing link?. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 683-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.032.
[6] Wang, Z., Cai, S., Liang, H., Wang, N., & Xiang, E. (2018). Intellectual capital and firm performance: the mediating role of innovation speed and quality. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(6), 1222-1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1511611.
[7] Black, J.S. and Porter, L.W. (2000), Management: Meeting New Challenges. Prentice Hall.
[8] Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 387-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.158.
[9] Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review Academy of Management Revier. Journal, 14(1).
[10] Allocca, M. A., & Kessler, E. H. (2006). Innovation speed in small and medium‐sized enterprises. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(3), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00389.x.
[11] Rosegger, G. (1991). Diffusion through interfirm cooperation: A case study. In Diffusion of Technologies and Social Behavior (pp. 265-293). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[12] Smith, P. G., & Reinertsen, D. G. (1997). Developing products in half the time: new rules, new tools. John Wiley & Sons.
[13] Kessler, E. H., & Bierly, P. E. (2002). Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implications of innovation speed. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.985742.
[14] Wynarczyk, P. (1997). The Economic Success of UK Innovative Small Firms," paper presented at the 1997 42nd World Conference of International Council for Small Business. San Francisco.
[15] Huarng, K. H., Mas-Tur, A., & Moreno, F. C. (2018). Innovation, knowledge, judgment, and decision-making as virtuous cycles. Journal of Business Research, 88, 278-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.031.
[16] Andreeva, T., & Kianto, A. (2011). Knowledge processes, knowledge‐intensity and innovation: a moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 1016-1034. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179343.
[17] Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long range planning, 33(1), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6.
[18] Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-560. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794671.
[19] Shu, C., Page, A. L., Gao, S., & Jiang, X. (2012). Managerial ties and firm innovation: is knowledge creation a missing link?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00883.x.
[20] Chen, J., & Liu, L. (2024). TMT entrepreneurial passion diversity and firm innovation performance: the mediating role of knowledge creation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(1), 268-291. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2022-0961.
[21] Polanyi, M. (2015). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post‐Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
[22] Mingaleva, Z., Deputatova, L., Starkov, Y. (2020). Management of Organizational Knowledge as a Basis for the Competitiveness of Enterprises in the Digital Economy. Lect. Notes Netw. Syst., 78, 203–212.
[23] Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.
[24] Ambastha, A., & Momaya, K. (2004). Competitiveness of firms: review of theory, frameworks and models. Singapore Management Review, 26(1), 45-61.
[25] Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2008 tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta.
[26] Bahagia, M. Q., Sukamto, A., Diliana, F. B., Ningrum, J., Rosita. N. (2023). Profil Industri Mikro dan Kecil 2021. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
[27] Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th Ed.). Cengage Learning.
[28] Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th Ed.). SAGE Publications.
[29] George, D., & Mallery, P. (2020). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th Ed.). Routledge.
[2] Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge management research & practice, 1(1), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500001.
[3] Khoa, V. D, & Anh, N. T. M. (2023). Examining the Relationship Between Supply Chain Integration, Innovation Speed and Supply Chain Performance Under Demand Uncertainty. Engineering Management Journal, 36(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2023.2174766.
[4] Jørgensen, E. J., & Mathisen, L. (2018). Speed of innovation and proximity in a rural context: the case of a manufacturing SME. In Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Education (pp. 24-40). Edward Elgar Publishing.
[5] Shan, P., Song, M., & Ju, X. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance: Is innovation speed a missing link?. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 683-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.032.
[6] Wang, Z., Cai, S., Liang, H., Wang, N., & Xiang, E. (2018). Intellectual capital and firm performance: the mediating role of innovation speed and quality. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(6), 1222-1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1511611.
[7] Black, J.S. and Porter, L.W. (2000), Management: Meeting New Challenges. Prentice Hall.
[8] Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 387-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.158.
[9] Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review Academy of Management Revier. Journal, 14(1).
[10] Allocca, M. A., & Kessler, E. H. (2006). Innovation speed in small and medium‐sized enterprises. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(3), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00389.x.
[11] Rosegger, G. (1991). Diffusion through interfirm cooperation: A case study. In Diffusion of Technologies and Social Behavior (pp. 265-293). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[12] Smith, P. G., & Reinertsen, D. G. (1997). Developing products in half the time: new rules, new tools. John Wiley & Sons.
[13] Kessler, E. H., & Bierly, P. E. (2002). Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implications of innovation speed. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.985742.
[14] Wynarczyk, P. (1997). The Economic Success of UK Innovative Small Firms," paper presented at the 1997 42nd World Conference of International Council for Small Business. San Francisco.
[15] Huarng, K. H., Mas-Tur, A., & Moreno, F. C. (2018). Innovation, knowledge, judgment, and decision-making as virtuous cycles. Journal of Business Research, 88, 278-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.031.
[16] Andreeva, T., & Kianto, A. (2011). Knowledge processes, knowledge‐intensity and innovation: a moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 1016-1034. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179343.
[17] Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long range planning, 33(1), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6.
[18] Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-560. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794671.
[19] Shu, C., Page, A. L., Gao, S., & Jiang, X. (2012). Managerial ties and firm innovation: is knowledge creation a missing link?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00883.x.
[20] Chen, J., & Liu, L. (2024). TMT entrepreneurial passion diversity and firm innovation performance: the mediating role of knowledge creation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(1), 268-291. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2022-0961.
[21] Polanyi, M. (2015). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post‐Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
[22] Mingaleva, Z., Deputatova, L., Starkov, Y. (2020). Management of Organizational Knowledge as a Basis for the Competitiveness of Enterprises in the Digital Economy. Lect. Notes Netw. Syst., 78, 203–212.
[23] Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.
[24] Ambastha, A., & Momaya, K. (2004). Competitiveness of firms: review of theory, frameworks and models. Singapore Management Review, 26(1), 45-61.
[25] Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2008 tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta.
[26] Bahagia, M. Q., Sukamto, A., Diliana, F. B., Ningrum, J., Rosita. N. (2023). Profil Industri Mikro dan Kecil 2021. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
[27] Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th Ed.). Cengage Learning.
[28] Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th Ed.). SAGE Publications.
[29] George, D., & Mallery, P. (2020). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th Ed.). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
2025-10-22
Issue
Section
Artikel
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Baziedy Aditya Darmawan, Satya Laksana Firmansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
How to Cite
Meningkatkan Daya Saing UMK: Mengungkap Peran Kecepatan Inovasi dan Penciptaan Pengetahuan. (2025). JURNAL NUSANTARA APLIKASI MANAJEMEN BISNIS, 10(2), 492-504. https://doi.org/10.29407/nusamba.v10i2.22631
