Factors Influencing iPad Acceptance in Mandatory Conditions by Students: Cross-Classes Analysis
This article is investigating the acceptance of the iPad among new students at a university. IPad usage is compulsory, and the purchase is part of the new student admission package. Two previous surveys using UTAUT have shown mixed results. The author decided to use survey results from both studies and reanalyze the questionnaire's answers. Data analysis was conducted using the SEM-PLS tool. The result showed only Anxiety and Self-Efficacy influencing Intention to Use while Intention to Use and Facilitating Condition influencing the use of iPad. The relation between Self-Efficacy and Intention to Use was moderated by gender, while the relationship between Intention to Use and Usage was moderated by experience in using a tablet.
W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9–30, 2003, doi: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748.
Y. S. Wang and Y. W. Liao, “Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 717–733, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.06.002.
K. E. Pramudita, “Penilaian Kesuksesan Penerapan Apple iPad Mini Menggunakan Model DeLone and McLEan 2003 pada Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta,” Atma Jaya Yogyakarta University, Yogyakarta, 2017.
V. Venkatesh, J. Y. L. Thong, and X. Xu, “Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead,” J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 328–376, 2016, doi: 10.17705/1jais.00428.
V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003, doi: 10.2307/30036540.
Penulis Artikel 1 2019
Penulis, Artikel 22019,
A. Morgan-Thomas and C. Veloutsou, “Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.019.
V. Venkatesh, “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 342–365, 2000, doi: 10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.
D. N. Gujarati, Basic Econometrics, 4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2003.
R. Sharifian, F. Askarian, M. Nematolahi, and P. Farhadi, “Factors influencing nurses’ acceptance of hospital information systems in Iran: application of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology,” Heal. Inf. Manag. J. vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 23–28, 2014, doi: 10.12826/18333575.2014.0001.Sharifian.
A. Kohnke, M. L. Cole, and R. Bush, “Incorporating UTAUT predictors for understanding home care patients’ and clinician’s acceptance of healthcare telemedicine equipment,” J. Technol. Manag. Innov., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 29–41, 2014, doi: 10.4067/S0718-27242014000200003.
F. Akbar, “What affects students’ acceptance and use of technology? A test of UTAUT in the context of a higher-education institution in Qatar,” Carnegie Mellon University, USA, 2013.
J. Marchewka, C. Liu, and K. Kostiwa, “An Application of the UTAUT Model for Understanding Student Perceptions Using Course Management Software,” Commun. IIMA, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 93, 2007.
D. T. Morales and F. L. Trinidad, “Digital Mortgage Banking Acceptability in Philippine Universal Banks: Evidence From Utaut Model,” J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manag., vol. 4, no. 15, pp. 01–15, 2019, doi: 10.35631/jistm.415001.
J. Khalilzadeh, A. B. Ozturk, and A. Bilgihan, “Security-related factors in extended UTAUT model for NFC based mobile payment in the restaurant industry,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 70, pp. 460–474, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.001.
L. L. Brennan and V. E. Johnson, “Learning Technology While Teaching Technology Management: A Trial of Distance Learning in Higher Education,” in Organizational Achievement and Failure in Information Technology Management, M. Khosrowpour, Ed. Hershey: IDEA Group Publishing, 2000, pp. 39–60.
E. Tan and J. Leby Lau, “Behavioural intention to adopt mobile banking among the millennial generation,” Young Consum., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 18–31, 2016, doi: 10.1108/YC-07-2015-00537.
A. A. Taiwo, and A. G. Downe, "The theory of user acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A meta-analytic review of empirical findings," J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 48–58, 2013.
I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
R. J. Hill, M. Fishbein, and I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research., vol. 6, no. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
A. Bandura and N. J. Cliffs, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory (pp. 376). Englewood . Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
M. H. Fagan, S. Neill, and B. R. Wooldridge, “An empirical investigation into the relationship between computer self-efficacy, anxiety, experience, support and usage,” J. Comput. Inf. Syst., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 95–104, 2003, doi: 10.1080/08874417.2004.11647572.
H. Jon-Chao, H. Chan-Jer, D. Chien-Yun, H. Ming-Yueh, L. Pei-Hsin, and C.-C. Lee, “Technology Anxiety and Implicit Learning Ability Affect Technology Leadership to Promote the use of Information Technology at Elementary Schools,” in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 64, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, 2012, pp. 555–563.
U. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach, 6th ed. Chicester: Wiley, 2013.
P. D. Leedy and J. E. Ormrod, Practical Research: Planning and Design, 11th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2015.
J. C. Westland, Structural equation models: From paths to networks, vol. 22. New York: Springer, 2019.
N. Tabri and C. M. Elliott, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed., vol. 1, no. 1. Guilford, 2012.
C. M. Ringle Wende, Sven, and Becker, Jan-Michael, “SmartPLS Release: 3.” SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt, Germany , 2015, [Online]. Available: http://www.smartpls.com.
W. Abdillah and H. Jogiyanto, Partial Least Square (PLS) Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dalam Penelitian Bisnis, vol. I, no. 1. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi, 2015.
X. Roser Cussó-Calabuig; Xavier Carrera Farran; Bosch-Capblanch, “Effects of intensive use of computers in secondary school on gender differences in attitudes towards ICT: A systematic review,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2111–2139, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10639-018-9706-6.
Y. Zhao, S. Deng, and R. Zhou, “Understanding Mobile Library Apps Continuance Usage in China: A Theoretical Framework and Empirical Study,” Int. J. Libr. Inf. Serv., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 161–173, 2015, doi: 10.1515/libri-2014-0148.
M. Limayem and C. K. Cheung, “Predicting the continued use of Internet-based learning technologies: the role of habit.,” Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 91–99, 2011, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2010.490956.
Y. Liu and T. Bakici, “Enterprise social media usage: The motives and the moderating role of public social media experience.,” Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 101, pp. 163–172, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.029.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
2. The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License