Analysis of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method for Selection the Superior Cattle
Abstract
The results of decision making play an important role in achieving a goal in solving certain problems. In the decision making process requires data or supporting evidence that can be used as a guide for the selection of solutions based on available alternatives, so as to produce choices that can increase productivity. MCDM method for the analysis of research data namely AHP, TOPSIS and SMART, the three methods are tested, because each MCDM method has a different way of working or algorithm, so it is necessary to experiment with certain cases. This study aims to determine the performance of the AHP, TOPSIS, and SMART methods with a case study of selecting superior female cattle breeds. The application of three MCDM methods for alternative analysts of prospective superior beef cattle based on testing to determine the accuracy of comparing the results/output of the system with expert recommendation solutions using a sample of 15 female cows that produce priority/ranking for superior beef cattle, shows that the performance of the three methods produces priority selection results the same, with 80% priority accuracy.
Downloads
References
C. S. Wang, H. L. Yang, and S. L. Lin, “To Make Good Decision: A Group DSS for Multiple Criteria Alternative Rank and Selection,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2015, pp. 1–15, 2015.
E. Kerselaers, E. Rogge, L. Lauwers, and G. Van Huylenbroeck, “Decision support for prioritising of land to be preserved for agriculture: Can participatory tool development help?,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 110, pp. 208–220, 2015.
I. Kaya and C. Kahraman, “A comparison of fuzzy multicriteria decision-making methods for intelligent building assessment,” J. Civ. Eng. Manag., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 59–69, 2014.
L. Sumaryanti, L. Lamalewa, and T. Istanto, “Implementation Of Multiple Fuzzy Criteria Decision Making For Recommendation Paddy Fertilizer,” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 236–243, 2019.
E. K. Zavadskas, J. Antucheviciene, Z. Turkish, and H. Adeli, “Hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making methods: A review of applications in engineering,” Sci. Iran., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2016.
A. Papadopoulos, D. Kalivas, and T. Hatzichristos, “Decision support system for nitrogen fertilisation using fuzzy theory,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 78, pp. 130–139, 2011.
J. Febriansyah, R. Gernowo, and A. Kusumawardhani, “Implementation of AHP and TOPSIS Method to Determine the Priority of Improving the Management of Government’s Assets,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Eng., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 46–53, 2017.
S. Supraja and P. Kousalya, “A comparative study by AHP and TOPSIS for the selection of all-round excellence award,” Int. Conf. Electr. Electron. Optim. Tech., pp. 314–319, 2016.
S. Nasional, I. Ics, and B. S. Nasional, Bibit sapi Potong - Bagian 5: Peranakan Ongole. Jakarta, 2015.
L. Sumaryanti, T. K. Rahayu, A. Prayitno, and Salju, “Comparison study of SMART and AHP method for paddy fertiliser recommendation in decision support system Comparison study of SMART and AHP method for paddy fertiliser recommendation in the decision support system,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth and Environ. Sci., pp. 1–5, 2019.
M. M. D. Widianta, T. Rizaldi, D. P. S. Setyohadi, and H. Y. Riskiawan, “Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Support Methods (AHP, TOPSIS, SAW & PROMENTHEE) for Employee Placement,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., pp. 1–5, 2017.
J. Thor, S. Ding, and S. Kamaruddin, “Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods From The Maintenance Alternative Selection Perspective,” Int. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 27–34, 2013.
M. B. Barfod and S. Leleur, Multi-criteria decision analysis for use in transport decision making. 2014.
D. Siregar, D. Arisandi, A. Usman, D. Irwan, and R. Rahim, “Research of Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique for Decision Support,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., pp. 1–6, 2017.
S. Gurung and R. Phipon, “Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection using AHP and TOPSIS method,” Int. J. Eng. Invent., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 13–17, 2016.
M. Bartolozzi, P. Bellini, P. Nesi, G. Pantaleo, and L. Santi, “A smart decision support system for smart city,” Proc. - 2015, pp. 117–122, 2015.
V. Patil, S. Payer, T. Teli, and S. Jaychandran, “Decision Support System for Agriculture Management,” Int. J. Emerg. Trends Sci. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 3505–3508, 2016.
M. Velasquez and P. T. Hester, “An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods,” Int. J. Oper. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 56–66, 2013.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
2. The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
