Abstrak
PETE, sebagai tempat pelatihan guru PE, membutuhkan analisis tentang fungsi mata pelajaran yang terkait dengan SDGs. Sejak tahun 2006, Active Learning Models (ALM) dalam kursus trek dan lapangan telah bercita-cita untuk memberikan pengalaman belajar kontekstual kepada kandidat guru pe. Namun, belum ada analisis mendalam tentang implementasi ALM dalam memastikan kesiapan dan kemandirian pembelajaran mahasiswa selama perkuliahan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memperkuat bukti bahwa ALM dapat membangun pengaturan diri dan efikasi diri calon guru PE. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis eksperimen yang lemah dengan menggunakan desain studi kasus one-shot. Sampel melibatkan 142 siswa (M = 83 dan F = 59) yang mengikuti sintaks ALM selama satu semester. Portofolio dan skor log-activity digunakan untuk mengukur pengaturan diri, sedangkan kuesioner Authentic Learning Self-Efficacy Scale (ALSS) digunakan untuk mengukur Efikasi Diri. Analisis data menggunakan deskriptif, korelasi, ANOVA, dan regresi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa para siswa memiliki efikasi diri yang memadai selama mengikuti ALM. Perbedaan karakteristik siswa berdasarkan kelas yang memerlukan penyesuaian dalam implementasi model instruksional dibahas. Selain itu, kegiatan pembelajaran ditetapkan sebagai variabel yang paling penting dalam menjelaskan pengaturan diri siswa dalam keberhasilan mencapai prestasi akademik.
Referensi
Albareda-Tiana, S., Vidal-Raméntol, S., Pujol-Valls, M., & Fernández-Morilla, M. (2018). Holistic Approaches to Develop Sustainability and Research Competencies in Pre-Service Teacher Training. Sustainability 2018, Vol. 10, Page 3698, 10(10), 3698. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10103698
Araban, S., Zainalipour, H., Hasan, R., Saadi, R., Javdan, M., Sezide, K., & Sajjadi, S. (2012). Study of Cooperative Learning Effects on Self-Efficacy and Academic Achievement in English Lesson of High School Students. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res, 2(9), 8524–8526. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/
Asún, S., Chivite, M. T., & Romero, M. R. (2020). Perceptions of Professional Competences in Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE). Sustainability 2020, Vol. 12, Page 3812, 12(9), 3812. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12093812
Bradley, R. L., Browne, B. L., & Kelley, H. M. (2017). Examining the Influence of Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation in Online Learning. College Student Journal, 51(4), 518–530. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/prin/csj/2017/00000051/00000004/art00008
Buran, A., & Evseeva, A. (2015). Prospects of Blended Learning Implementation at Technical University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.10.049
Coenders, F., & Terlouw, C. (2015). A Model for In-service Teacher Learning in the Context of an Innovation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(5), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9432-5
Daouk, Z., Bahous, R., & Bacha, N. N. (2016). Perceptions on the effectiveness of active learning strategies. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 8(3), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2015-0037/FULL/XML
Digiacinto, K. L., Bulger, S. M., & Wayda, V. (2017). Rethinking PETE Program Admissions to Include Teacher Candidate Dispositions. The Physical Educator, 74(1), 63–84.
Elahi, M., Ricci, F., & Rubens, N. (2016). A survey of active learning in collaborative filtering recommender systems. Computer Science Review, 20, 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COSREV.2016.05.002
Evens, M., Elen, J., Larmuseau, C., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Promoting the development of teacher professional knowledge: Integrating content and pedagogy in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2018.07.001
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012a). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012b). How to Design and Evaluate Research In Education (6th ed.). Mc Graw Hill.
Funke, J., Fischer, A., & Holt, D. V. (2018). Competencies for Complexity: Problem Solving in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 41–53). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_3
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Lai, C.-L., Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.-H. (2018). The effects of computer-supported self-regulation in science inquiry on learning outcomes, learning processes, and self-efficacy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 863–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9585-y
Larkin, T. L. (2022). Lessons Learned During a Global Pandemic: Teaching Takeaways. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 390 LNNS, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93907-6_5
Martin, J. P. (2018). Skills for the 21st century: Findings and policy lessons from the OECD survey of adult skills (No. 138; IZA Policy Paper). https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/180633
Nelson, L. P., & Crow, M. L. (2014). Do Active-Learning Strategies Improve Students’ Critical Thinking? Higher Education Studies, 4(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v4n2p77
Songserm, U., & Tosola, C. (2017). Active Learning Instruction for higher order thinking skill development. International Humanities, Social Sciences and Arts, 10(5). https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Veridian-E-Journal/article/view/109870
Stefanou, C., Stolk, J. D., Prince, M., Chen, J. C., & Lord, S. M. (2013). Self-regulation and autonomy in problem- and project-based learning environments. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1469787413481132
Stephen, J. S., Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., & Dubay, C. (2020). Persistence Model of Non-traditional Online Learners: Self-Efficacy, Self-Regulation, and Self-Direction, 34(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1745619
Suroto. (2018, July 1). Active Learning Model in Track and Field Course for Pre-service Physical Education Teacher. Proceedings of the 2nd Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Conference: Establishing Identities through Language, Culture, and Education (SOSHEC 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/soshec-18.2018.68
Taheri-Kharameh, Z., Sharififard, F., Asayesh, H., Sepahvandi, M., & Hoseini, M. H. (2018). Relationship between academic self-efficacy and motivation among medical science students. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(7), JC07-JC10. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2018/29482.11770
Taliaferro, A. R., Ayers, S. F., & Housner, L. (2017). A Descriptive Analysis of the Application of PETE Standards. The Journal of School Health, 74(4), 606–626.
Tezer, M., Yildiz, E. P., & Uzunboylu, H. (2018). Online authentic learning self-efficacy: a scale development. Quality & Quantity, 52(S1), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0641-1
Usher, E. L. (2012). Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 3001–3003). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_835
Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
Virtanen, P., Niemi, H., & Nevgi, A. (2017). Active learning and self-regulation enhance student teachers’ professional competences. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 42(12). https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/ielapa.313660196196001
Yan, Z., Chiu, M. M., & Ko, P. Y. (2020). Effects of self-assessment diaries on academic achievement, self-regulation, and motivation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 27(5), 562–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1827221/SUPPL_FILE/CAIE_A_1827221_SM1759.DOCX
Yao, C. (2019). An investigation of adult learners’ viewpoints to a blended learning environment in promoting sustainable development in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.01.290
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/CEPS.1999.1016
##submission.copyrightStatement##