Evaluation of User Acceptance of Enterprise Resource Planning System at Material Resource Planning Division of PT. Xacti Indonesia

Abstract views: 301 , PDF downloads: 312
Keywords: Enterprise Resource Planning, PC tablet, Modified UTAUT


The purpose of this evaluation is to evaluate user acceptance of the Glovia ERP system, whichever embedded in PC to assist operator staffs to record material stocks. The research methodology used in this study is the UTAUT model adjusted for the research problem's conditions. The issue happens because the Staff feel more comfortable with the old procedure and think it has supported their performance well. The respondents, as the sample in this study, are the staff operator from the MRP division. Data analysis is done using Partial Least Squares—the result of the research state that the Performance Expectancy variable has a significant effect on the Behavioral Intention variable. On the contrary, the other variables do not significantly affect the Behavioral Intention variable. The behavioral Intention variable has an R square value of 0.352 percent, which states that four independent variables can explain 35.2% of the Behavioral Intention variable. From the test results, it is suggested that the MRP division of PT can use the recommendations. Xacti Indonesia, as a consideration that can be used to improve the system currently applied.


Download data is not yet available.


P. P. Dewi and N. L. P. Asriani, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Kesuksesan Penerapan Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Pada Perusahaan Pengguna ERP Wilayah Bali,” J. Ris. Akunt. Mercu Buana, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 39, 2019.

T. Asgar, “Towards Better Engineering of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems,” no. May 2017, 2016.

I. Mahendra, “Analisa Penerimaan Sistem Enterprize Resource Planning ( ERP ) Pada PT GBS Megguakan Unified Theory Of Acceptance And Use Of Technology ( UTAUT ),” vol. XII, no. 2, pp. 190–200, 2016.

I. P. Ramayasa, “Evaluation Model of Success and Acceptance of E-Learning,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 3182, no. 3, pp. 462–469, 2015.

N. Achim and A. Al Kassim, “Computer Usage: The Impact of Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-efficacy,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 172, pp. 701–708, 2015.

B. Aldosari, S. Al-Mansour, H. Aldosari, and A. Alanazi, “Assessment of factors influencing nurses acceptance of electronic medical record in a Saudi Arabia hospital,” Informatics Med. Unlocked, vol. 10, no. December 2017, pp. 82–88, 2018.

Hariyadi and R. Rival, “Penerapan Teknologi Informasi Digital Library Ur Dengan Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model Di Fisip Universitas Riau,” Jom Fisip, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2017.

V. Venkatesh, Mi. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “USER ACCEPTANCE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: TOWARD A UNIFIED VIEW,” MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 27, pp. 425–478, 2003.

M. S. M. Soliman, N. Karia, S. Moeinzadeh, M. S. Islam, and I. Mahmud, “Modelling intention to use ERP systems among higher education institutions in Egypt: UTAUT perspective,” Int. J. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 429–440, 2019.

M. Wagaw, “Acceptance of homegrown enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in Ethiopia,” Appl. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 6, 2017.

L. Hakim, “Evaluasi Terhadap Penerimaan Masyarakat Terhadap Situs Pembelajaran belajarkoding.net Menggunakan UTAUT,” Universitas Airlangga, 2018.

V. R. Andwika and R. W. Witjaksono, “Analysis of User Acceptance of ERP System on After Sales Function Using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model,” Int. J. Adv. Data Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2020.

P. Wulandari, N. H. Wardani, and M. C. Saputra, “Evaluasi Terhadap Penerimaan Pengguna Sistem Enterprises Resource Planning PT . Perkebunan Nusantara XI ( Persero ) Dengan Model Adapted,” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput. Univ. Brawijaya, vol. 2, no. 9, pp., 2841–2849, 2018.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian : Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. 2017.

M. D. Williams, N. P. Rana, and Y. K. Dwivedi, The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review, vol. 28, no. 3. 2015.

N. K. Lowe, “What Is a Pilot Study?,” JOGNN - J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 117–118, 2019.

A. Arifudin, Y. T. Mursityo, and A. D. Herlambang, “Evaluasi Kualitas Sistem Informasi Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Badan Perencanaan, Penelitian, Pengembangan Kota Malang Dengan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Termodifikasi,” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 6, pp., 5917–5925, 2019.


J. Sarwono and U. Narimawati, Membuat Skripsi, Tesis, dan Disertasi dengan Partial Least Square SEM (PLS-SEM), 1st ed. Yogyakarta: C.V ANDI OFFSET, 2015.

M. Al-Emran, V. Mezhuyev, and A. Kamaludin, PLS-SEM in Information Systems Research: A Comprehensive Methodological Reference, vol. 845. Springer International Publishing, 2019.

A. S. Hussein, “Penelitian Bisnis dan Manajemen Menggunakan PLS (smart-PLS 3.0),” 2015.

SmartPLS, “Partial Least Square - Multigroup Analysis (PLS-MGA).” [Online]. Available: https://www.smartpls.com/documentation/algorithms-and-techniques/multigroup-analysis. [Accessed: 20-Mar-2020].

A. Afthanorhan, A. Aimran, and S. Ahmad, “Permutation Test, Non-parametric, and Confidence Set Approaches to Multi-Group Analysis for Comparing 2 Groups Using Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling (Pls-Sem),” Adv. Res., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 315–328, 2015.

PlumX Metrics

How to Cite
F. Rahmadan, Y. T. Mursityo, and N. H. Wardani, “Evaluation of User Acceptance of Enterprise Resource Planning System at Material Resource Planning Division of PT. Xacti Indonesia”, intensif, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 27-42, Feb. 2021.