Pengembangan Computational Thinking Melalui IoT Apps Programming Dengan Tinkercad

  • Theresia Herlina Rochadiani Universitas Pradita
  • Handri Santoso Universitas Pradita
  • Hendra Mayatopani Universitas Pradita
Abstract views: 177 , PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 0
Keywords: Computational Thinking, IoT Application, Tinkercad.


Computational thinking is one of competencies are needed recently. Most countries had already included computational thinking into their curriculum. Based on PISA 2018, Indonesia placed 72nd ranking of 77 countries for reading, 72nd ranking of 78 countries for mathematics, and 70th ranking of 78 countries for sciences. It is of concern to government and us to elevate this computational thinking ability, especially for students. Through this community service, the training of IoT programming using Tinkercad is given to PAHOA Senior High School students. Theory and hands-on practical in this training was followed by 40 students for 4 months. Based on questionnaire in the end of this training, 62% participations agreed that their computational thinking increase through this training and 96% participations could make IoT apps.


Download data is not yet available.


Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., Engelhardt, K., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2016). Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education - Implications for policy and practice. In Joint Research Centre (JRC) (Issue June).

Fidler, D. (2016). Future Skils: Update and literature review.

Gerakan PANDAI, Langkah Awal Penggerak Computational Thinking Siswa Indonesia. (2020).

Gomes, M., Hirata, G., & Oliveira, J. B. A. e. (2020). Student composition in the PISA assessments: Evidence from Brazil. International Journal of Educational Development, 79(November).

Kasih, A. P. (2020). Nilai PISA Siswa Indonesia Rendah, Nadiem Siapkan 5 Strategi Ini. Kompas.Com.

Ling, L. U., Tammie, C. S., Nasrah, N., Jane, L., & Norazila, A. A. (2018). an Evaluation Tool To Measure Computational Thinking Skills : Pilot Investigation. Herald NAMSA, 1(September), 606–614.

Mohaghegh, D. M., & McCauley, M. (2016). International journal of computer science and information technologies (IJCSIT). 7(3), 1524–1530.

OECD. (n.d.-a). PISA 2021 MATHEMATICS FRAMEWORK (DRAFT). 2nd draft 32-40.

OECD. (n.d.-b). PISA 2022 MATHEMATICS FRAMEWORK. Retrieved March 14, 2021, from

Seow, P., Looi, C.-K., How, M.-L., Wadhwa, B., & Wu, L.-K. (2019). Educational Policy and Implementation of Computational Thinking and Programming : Case Study of Singapore. In S.-C. Kong & H. Abelson (Eds.), Computational Thinking Education (pp. 345–362). Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

So, H. J., Jong, M. S. Y., & Liu, C. C. (2020). Computational Thinking Education in the Asian Pacific Region. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 1–8.

Tentang Bebras Indonesia. (n.d.). Retrieved March 14, 2021, from

World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020 | World Economic Forum. The Future of Jobs Report, October, 1163.

Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565–568.

Zahid, M. Z. (2020). “Computational Thinking” Menyongsong PISA 2021.

PlumX Metrics

How to Cite
Rochadiani, T. H., Santoso, H., & Mayatopani, H. (2022). Pengembangan Computational Thinking Melalui IoT Apps Programming Dengan Tinkercad. Jurnal ABDINUS : Jurnal Pengabdian Nusantara, 6(1), 230-240.