STRATEGI KEMANDIRIAN INDUSTRI PETROKIMIA NASIONAL

Authors

  • Sirma Oktaviani Situmorang Kementerian Perindustrian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29407/jae.v11i1.28691

Keywords:

petrochemical industry, industrial policy, global value chain

Abstract

This study analyzes Indonesia’s petrochemical industry dependence on imports and formulates policy strategies to strengthen domestic industrial independence. Using a qualitative policy analysis approach combined with descriptive-comparative analysis, this research utilizes secondary data from international institutions, national statistics, and peer-reviewed journals (last 5 years). The findings show that Indonesia faces structural constraints including high feedstock prices, limited upstream–downstream integration, infrastructure gaps, and dependence on global supply chains. Comparative evidence from ASEAN and East Asia demonstrates that integrated industrial policy, energy pricing reform, and scale investment are key determinants of competitiveness. The study recommends refinery–petrochemical integration, gas pricing reform, fiscal incentives, and industrial cluster development. These measures are expected to reduce import dependency and strengthen industrial resilience.

Abstract views: 25 , pdf downloads: 13

References

Aiginger, K., & Rodrik, D. (2020). Rebirth of industrial policy and an agenda for the twenty-first century. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 20(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-019-00322-3

Baldwin, R. (2022). Global supply chains: Why they emerged, why they matter, and where they are going. CEPR Press.

BP. (2022). Statistical Review of World Energy 2022. BP plc.

Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics and supply chain management (5th ed.). Pearson.

Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2021). Global value chains and development: Redefining the contours of 21st century capitalism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 45(2), 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beaa061

International Energy Agency. (2018). The future of petrochemicals: Towards more sustainable plastics and fertilisers. IEA.

International Energy Agency. (2023). World energy outlook 2023. IEA.

Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. (2023). Kebijakan harga gas bumi tertentu untuk industri. KESDM.

Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. (2024). Handbook of energy and economic statistics of Indonesia. KESDM.

Kementerian Perindustrian. (2022). Laporan kinerja sektor industri kimia. Kemenperin.

Kementerian Perindustrian. (2023). Roadmap pengembangan industri petrokimia nasional. Kemenperin.

Kementerian Perindustrian. (2024). Data industri petrokimia Indonesia. Kemenperin.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Policies for the future of manufacturing. OECD Publishing.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Global value chains: Efficiency and risks in the context of global shocks. OECD Publishing.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.

Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Harvard University Working Paper.

Rodrik, D. (2020). Industrial policy: Don’t ask why, ask how. Middle East Development Journal, 12(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17938120.2020.1714342

Thiumsak, T. (2024). Cost structure and competitiveness of petrochemical industries in Southeast Asia. Journal of Asian Industrial Economics, 9(1), 45–62.

United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2021). Industrial development report 2021: Industrializing in the digital age. UNIDO.

World Bank. (2023). Global economic prospects 2023. World Bank.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik industri manufaktur Indonesia 2024. BPS.

INAPLAS. (2024). Laporan industri plastik Indonesia. Asosiasi Industri Olefin, Aromatik, dan Plastik Indonesia.

Pertamina. (2024). Laporan tahunan PT Pertamina (Persero).

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2026-05-13

Issue

Section

Volume 11 No. 1 Tahun 2026

How to Cite

STRATEGI KEMANDIRIAN INDUSTRI PETROKIMIA NASIONAL. (2026). JAE (JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN EKONOMI), 11(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.29407/jae.v11i1.28691