Technology Acceptance Analysis Using UTAUT: A Study of QRIS Acceptance during the Pandemic

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29407/intensif.v8i2.21982

Keywords:

UTAUT, COVID-19, QRIS, Perceived Risk, Technology Acceptance

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic situation has compelled society to practice physical distancing. One of the government's efforts is to encourage the use of the QRIS payment method to minimize direct physical contact during transactions. Objective: The purpose of this research is to analyze the primary driving factors in the adoption of QRIS technology. The research urgency is to determine the most contributing predictor from the variables within the UTAUT model among the people of Jabodetabek. Methods: This research used the quantitative method by conducting an online survey among 384 respondents distributed across the Jabodetabek region. The sampling technique utilized was non-purposive sampling with criteria including domicile, age, reasons, frequency, and experience of QRIS usage. Conclusion: The results of the factor analysis test indicate that the performance expectancy and effort expectancy variables are combined into one variable, while the social influence variable is divided into two independent variables. The research findings reveal that the perceived risk variable is the predictor with the most significant contribution in the context of the pandemic situation. Future researchers are expected to be able to develop the research model in other contexts with different goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Denny Prasetya, Universitas Indonesia

Department Communication Science

Alexandra Rianti Grandi Rahardjo, Universitas Indonesia

Department Communication Science

Eva Reh Ulina Aritonang, Universitas Indonesia

Department Communication Science

Jody Manggalaningwang, Universitas Indonesia

Department Communication Science

Nadya Ayu Maharani, Universitas Indonesia

Department Communication Science

Yohanes Ivander, Universitas Indonesia

Department Communication Science

Abdinabi Mukhamadiyev, Gachon University

Department of Computer Engineering

References

H. M. Aji, I. Berakon, and M. Md Husin, “COVID-19 and e-wallet usage intention: A multigroup analysis between Indonesia and Malaysia,” Cogent Business and Management, vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1804181.

A. Michael Musyaffi, D. Agustin Pratama Sari, D. K. Respati, A. Michael MUSYAFFI, D. Agustin Pratama SARI, and D. Kismayanti RESPATI, “Understanding of Digital Payment Usage During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study of UTAUT Extension Model in Indonesia,” Journal of Asian Finance, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 475–0482, 2021, doi: 10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no6.0475.

A. Rohman, “Implementasi Model Utaut Pada Industri Perbankan di Indonesia,” Kajian Branding Indonesia, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 60–69, 2022, doi: 10.21632/kbi.4.1.60-69.

K. A. Mutaqin and E. Sutoyo, “Analysis of Citizens Acceptance for e-Government Services in Bandung, Indonesia: The Use of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model,” Bulletin of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–25, 2020, doi: 10.25008/bcsee.v1i1.3.

H. Khechine, B. Raymond, and M. Augier, “The adoption of a social learning system: Intrinsic value in the UTAUT model,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 2306–2325, 2020, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12905.

C. M. Chao, “Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model,” Front Psychol, vol. 10, no. JULY, pp. 1–14, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652.

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “Quarterly,” vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003.

W. H. Bommer, S. Rana, and E. Milevoj, “A meta-analysis of eWallet adoption using the UTAUT model,” International Journal of Bank Marketing, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 791–819, 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJBM-06-2021-0258.

Y. Wang, Y.-H. Hung, and S.-C. T. Chou, “Acceptance of E-Government Service : A Validation of the UTAUT Department of Information Management,” Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on E-ACTIVITIES, Venice, Italy, November 20-22, no. January, pp. 165–170, 2006.

F. E. Gunawan and R. Novendra, “Analysis Of Technology Acceptance And Customer Trust In Bitcoin In Indonesia Using UTAUT Framework,” Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, no. January, pp. 1–18, 2017.

F. Rahmadan, Y. T. Mursityo, and N. H. Wardani, “Evaluation of User Acceptance of Enterprise Resource Planning System at Material Resource Planning Division of PT. Xacti Indonesia,” INTENSIF: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Penerapan Teknologi Sistem Informasi, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 27–42, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.29407/INTENSIF.V5I1.14590.

S. Sarosa and A. R. Setyowati, “Factors Influencing iPad Acceptance in Mandatory Conditions by Students: Cross-Classes Analysis,” INTENSIF: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Penerapan Teknologi Sistem Informasi, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 247–258, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.29407/INTENSIF.V4I2.14455.

K. Raj, L. V., Amilan, S., Aparna, “Role of perceived countries’ advantages of cashless economy in behavioral intentions of using cashless transactions: an empirical analysis,” Journal of Indian Business Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 413–433, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-06-2020-0186.

I. Im, Y. Kim, and H. J. Han, “The effects of perceived risk and technology type on users’ acceptance of technologies,” Information and Management, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2007.03.005.

K. Al-Saedi, M. Al-Emran, T. Ramayah, and E. Abusham, “Developing a general extended UTAUT model for M-payment adoption,” Technology in Society, vol. 62, no. June, p. 101293, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101293.

R. de S. Abrahão, S. N. Moriguchi, and D. F. Andrade, “Intention of adoption of mobile payment: An analysis in the light of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT),” RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 221–230, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rai.2016.06.003.

R. Rita and M. H. Fitria, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor UTAUT dan Trust Terhadap Behavioral Intention Pengguna BNI Mobile Banking Pada Pekerja Migran Indonesia,” Jesya (Jurnal Ekonomi & Ekonomi Syariah), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 926–939, 2021, doi: 10.36778/jesya.v4i2.453.

E. Purwanto and J. Loisa, “The Intention and Use Behaviour of the Mobile Banking System in indonesia: UTAUT Model,” Technology Reports of Kansai University , no. July, pp. 2757-2767., 2020.

J. Khalilzadeh, A. B. Ozturk, and A. Bilgihan, “Security-related factors in extended UTAUT model for NFC based mobile payment in the restaurant industry,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 70, pp. 460–474, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.001.

M. A. Alajmi, “The acceptance and use of electronic information resources among faculty of selected Gulf Cooperation Council States universities,” Information Development, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 447–466, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0266666918755535.

F. W. Dulle and M. K. Minishi-Majanja, “The suitability of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (utaut) model in open access adoption studies,” Information Development, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 32–45, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0266666910385375.

Y. Zhao and F. Bacao, “How does the pandemic facilitate mobile payment? An investigation on users’ perspective under the COVID-19 pandemic,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1–22, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031016.

R. D. Octaviani, H. Prabowo, and D. Sari, “Exploring The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) In Consumer Purchase Decision (The Case of Online Ticket Purchasing in Indonesia During Covid-19),” Central European Management Journal, vol. 30, pp. 352–358, 2022, doi: 10.57030/23364890.cemj.30.4.29.

J. Erjavec and A. Manfreda, “Online shopping adoption during COVID-19 and social isolation: Extending the UTAUT model with herd behavior,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 65, no. December 2021, p. 102867, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102867.

M. M. M. Abbad, “Using the UTAUT model to understand students’ usage of e-learning systems in developing countries,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 7205–7224, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10573-5.

R. Z. Wu, J. H. Lee, and X. F. Tian, “Determinants of the intention to use cross-border mobile payments in korea among chinese tourists: An integrated perspective of utaut2 with ttf and itm,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1537–1556, 2021, doi: 10.3390/jtaer16050086.

C. W. Mustika, “Analisis Minat Masyarakat Terhadap Penggunaan E- Tollpass Di Jabodetabek Dengan Modified Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (Modified Utaut,” e-Proceeding of Management, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–134, 2018.

R. Hoque and G. Sorwar, “Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: An extension of the UTAUT model,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 101, pp. 75–84, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.002.

J. Savić and A. Pešterac, “Antecedents of mobile banking: UTAUT model,” The European Journal of Applied Economics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2019, doi: 10.5937/ejae15-19381.

L. Neuman, W, Social Researchs Methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches (Ed. 7th). Pearson Education Limited, 2014.

J. Sarwono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif (Edisi Pertama). 2006.

N. Sa’idah, “Analisis Penggunaan Sistem Pendaftaran Online (E-Health) Berdasarkan Unified Theory Of Accepptance And Use Of Technology (UTAUT),” Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 72–81, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v5i1.2017.72-81.

V. Bhatiasevi, “An extended UTAUT model to explain the adoption of mobile banking,” Information Development, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 799–814, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0266666915570764.

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2024-08-01

How to Cite

[1]
D. Prasetya, “Technology Acceptance Analysis Using UTAUT: A Study of QRIS Acceptance during the Pandemic”, INTENSIF: J. Ilm. Penelit. dan Penerap. Tek. Sist. Inf., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 181–199, Aug. 2024.