Water Management Zone Mapping on Peatland in Limbung Village Sungai Raya District

Qishtamy Wahyu Alyaminy; Rossie Wiedya Nusantara; Ari Krisnohadi

doi:10.29407/intensif.v8i1.21357

Authors

Qishtamy Wahyu Alyaminy Universitas Tanjungpura http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6203-998X
Rossie Wiedya Nusantara Universitas Tanjungpura http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6628-5916
Ari Krisnohadi Universitas Tanjungpura http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9574-8163

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29407/intensif.v8i1.21357

Keywords:

Peatland, Water Management Zone, Land Survey, Peatland Restoration

Abstract

This study focuses on mapping peatland water management zones, which have not been mapped in previous research. These water management zones serve as crucial reference points for the development and implementation of the National Peatland Ecosystem Protection and Management Plan. The research applied various methods, including soil survey, drilling, soil sampling, measuring groundwater level and canal, matching methods, and create a peat water management zone map. Based on research and map overlays, five water management zones were obtained, these zones include Zone I (F2.B1.K1.C2) covering 1.39 ha (11.58%), Zone II (F1.B1.K1.C2) covering 0.82 ha (6. 83%), Zone III (F2.B1.K1.C3) covering 1.93 ha (16.08%), Zone IV (F1.B1.K1.C3) covering 3.86 ha (32.17%) and Zone V (F1.B1.K2.C3) covering 4.00 ha (33.33%). These water management zones will be related to conservation activities to maintain the quality of soil and water on peatlands. Peatland restoration management activities in Zone I can be accomplished by canal blocking and maximum planting patterns, in Zone II by canal filling and maximum planting patterns, in Zone III by canal blocking and enrichment plants, in Zone IV by canal backfilling and maximum planting patterns, and in Zone V by canal backfilling and deep wells.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Qishtamy Wahyu Alyaminy, Universitas Tanjungpura

Ilmu Tanah, Universitas Tanjungpura

Rossie Wiedya Nusantara, Universitas Tanjungpura

Ilmu Tanah, Universitas Tanjungpura

Ari Krisnohadi, Universitas Tanjungpura

Ilmu Tanah, Universitas Tanjungpura

References

S. Ritung, Wahyunto, and K. Nugroho, Peta Lahan Gambut Indonesia Skala 1:250.000. 2011. [Online]. Available: http://bbsdlp.litbang.deptan.go.id

J. Xu, P. J. Morris, J. Liu, and J. Holden, “PEATMAP: Refining estimates of global peatland distribution based on a meta-analysis,” Catena (Amst), vol. 160, pp. 134–140, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2017.09.010.

S. Treby and S. P. Grover, “Carbon emissions from Australian Sphagnum peatlands increase with feral horse (Equus caballus) presence,” J Environ Manage, vol. 347, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119034.

I. Las, M. Sarwani, A. Mulyani, and M. F. Saragih, “Dilema dan Rasionalisasi Kebijakan Pemanfaatan Lahan Gambut untuk Areal Pertanian,” Bogor, 2012.

D. A. Suriadikarta, “Teknologi Pengelolaan Lahan Rawa Berkelanjutan: Studi Kasus Kawasa EX PLG Kalimantan Tengah,” Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 45–54, Jul. 2012.

Masganti, K. Anwar, and M. A. Susanti, “Potensi dan Pemanfaatan Lahan Gambut Dangkal untuk Pertanian,” Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 43–52, Jul. 2017.

Masganti, Wahyunto, A. Dariah, Nurhayati, and R. Yusuf, “Karakteristik dan Potensi Pemanfaatan Lahan Gambut Terdegradasi di Provinsi Riau,” Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan , vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 59–66, Jul. 2014.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Pemulihan Ekosistem Gambut. 2015.

K. Fikri, “Pengelolaan Tata Air Lahan Gambut Berkelanjutan,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional 2 Quo Vadis Restorasi Gambut di Indonesia: Tantangan & Peluang Menuju Ekosistem Gambut Berkelanjutan, pp. 182–187, Oct. 2022.

S. M. Napitupulu and B. Mudiantoro, “Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air Pada Lahan Gambut Yang Berkelanjutan,” Annual Civil Engineering Seminar, pp. 330–337, 2015.

E. Runtunuwu, B. Kartiwa, K. Kharmilasari, K. Sudarman, W. T. Nugroho, and A. Firmansyah, “Dinamika Elevasi Muka Air Pada Lahan dan Saluran Di Lahan Gambut,” Jurnal Riset Geologi dan Pertambangan, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 63, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.14203/risetgeotam2011.v21.47.

C. Buschmann et al., “Perspectives on agriculturally used drained peat soils: Comparison of the socioeconomic and ecological business environments of six European regions,” Land use policy, vol. 90, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104181.

A. Dohong, Lola Cassiophea, and B. L. Triadi, Modul Pelatihan: Pembangunan Infrastruktur Pembasahan Gambut Sekat Kanal Berbasis Masyarakat. 2017. [Online]. Available: www.brg.go.id;

H. Ritzema, S. Limin, K. Kusin, J. Jauhiainen, and H. Wösten, “Canal blocking strategies for hydrological restoration of degraded tropical peatlands in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia,” Catena (Amst), vol. 114, pp. 11–20, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.009.

S. Budiharta, E. Meijaard, J. A. Wells, N. K. Abram, and K. A. Wilson, “Enhancing feasibility: Incorporating a socio-ecological systems framework into restoration planning,” Environ Sci Policy, vol. 64, pp. 83–92, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.014.

S. Budiharta et al., “Restoration to offset the impacts of developments at a landscape scale reveals opportunities, challenges and tough choices,” Global Environmental Change, vol. 52, pp. 152–161, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.008.

T. Santika et al., “Interannual climate variation, land type and village livelihood effects on fires in Kalimantan, Indonesia,” Global Environmental Change, vol. 64, p. 102129, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102129.

Suyanto and Y. Nugroho, “Zonasi Tinggi Muka Air Tanah Gambut di Kawasan Hutan Lindung Liang Anggang Kota Banjarbaru Kalimantan Selatan,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lingkungan Lahan Basah , vol. 6, 2021.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, “Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor P.16/Menlhk/Setjen/Kum.1/2/2017 Tentang Pedoman Teknis Pemulihan Fungsi Ekosistem Gambut,” 2017.

F. Agus and I. G. M. Subiksa, Lahan Gambut: Potensi untuk Pertanian dan Aspek Lingkungan. 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.icraf.cgiar.org/sea

A. L. Sinclair et al., “Effects of distance from canal and degradation history on peat bulk density in a degraded tropical peatland,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 699, p. 134199, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134199.

L. P. Triatmojo, “Kualitas dan Kesuburan Lahan Gambut Pada Kawasan Gambut Bersekat di Kabupaten Kubu Raya,” Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak, 2022.

R. W. Nusantara, R. Manurung, U. Lestari, and S. Pandagi, “Dampak Sekat Kanal Terhadap Fluktuasi Muka Air Tanah pada Lahan Gambut di Kabupaten Kubu Raya – Provinsi Kalimantan Barat,” Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 393–402, 2023.

M. Wang, H. Liu, and B. Lennartz, “Small-scale spatial variability of hydro-physical properties of natural and degraded peat soils,” Geoderma, vol. 399, p. 115123, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115123.

R. D. Putra, R. W. Nusantara, and R. Manurung, “KARAKTERISTIK SIFAT KIMIA TANAH PADA LAHAN GAMBUT BERSEKAT KANAL DI DESA KUBU PADI KABUPATEN KUBU RAYA,” Jurnal Sains Pertanian Equator, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 640, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.26418/jspe.v12i3.64780.

Badan Restorasi Gambut, Rencana_Restorasi_Ekosistem_Gambut_RREG_Sumatera_Selatan_Tahun_2017_-_2021. 2019.

C. Wang, A. Wang, D. Guo, H. Li, and S. Zang, “Off-peak NDVI correction to reconstruct Landsat time series for post-fire recovery in high-latitude forests,” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, vol. 107, p. 102704, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102704.

D. Sitepu and Alue. Dohong, Modul Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Revegetasi di Lahan Gambut. 2019.

M. A. Lasaiba and A. W. Saud, “Pemanfaatan Citra Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS Untuk Identifikasi Kerapatan Vegetasi Menggunakan Metode Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) Di Kota Ambon,” Jurnal Geografi dan Pengajarannya, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 53–65, Jun. 2022.

D. K. Sunaryo and M. Z. Iqmi, “Pemanfaatan Citra Landsat 8 untuk Pendeteksian dan Mengetahui Hubungan Kerapatan Vegetasi Terhadap Suhu Permukaan,” Spectra, vol. XIII, pp. 55–72, 2015.

M. Hanif, Bahan Pelatihan Penginderaan Jauh Tingkat Lanjut. 2017. [Online]. Available: http://nasa.gov

A. Khairawan, Ermanita, and N. Falih, “Analisis Perubahan Indeks Kerapatan Vegetasi Memanfaatkan Citra Landsat (Studi Kasus : Provinsi DKI Jakarta),” Seminar Nasional Mahasiswa Ilmu Komputer dan Aplikasinya (SENAMIKA) , pp. 62–72, Aug. 2020.

K. A. Nugent, I. B. Strachan, M. Strack, N. T. Roulet, and L. Rochefort, “Multi‐year net ecosystem carbon balance of a restored peatland reveals a return to carbon sink,” Glob Chang Biol, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 5751–5768, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1111/gcb.14449.

K. A. Nugent, I. B. Strachan, N. T. Roulet, M. Strack, S. Frolking, and M. Helbig, “Prompt active restoration of peatlands substantially reduces climate impact,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 14, no. 12, p. 124030, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab56e6.

M. Helbig et al., “The biophysical climate mitigation potential of boreal peatlands during the growing season,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 15, no. 10, p. 104004, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abab34.

H. Liu, F. Rezanezhad, and B. Lennartz, “Impact of land management on available water capacity and water storage of peatlands,” Geoderma, vol. 406, p. 115521, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115521.

G. Granath, P. A. Moore, M. C. Lukenbach, and J. M. Waddington, “Mitigating wildfire carbon loss in managed northern peatlands through restoration,” Sci Rep, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 28498, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1038/srep28498.

E. L. Shuttleworth et al., “Restoration of blanket peat moorland delays stormflow from hillslopes and reduces peak discharge,” J Hydrol X, vol. 2, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.hydroa.2018.100006.

A. A. Sirin, M. A. Medvedeva, D. A. Makarov, A. A. Maslov, and H. Joosten, “Multispectral satellite based monitoring of land cover change and associated fire reduction after large-scale peatland rewetting following the 2010 peat fires in Moscow Region (Russia),” Ecol Eng, vol. 158, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106044.

A. Jaya, E. U. Antang, C. Birawa, and H. Gunawan, “Pengembangan Agroekowisata Terintegrasi di Lahan Gambut di Kalimantan Tengah,” Jurnal Pengabdian Kampus, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 26–42, Jul. 2021.

L. B. Triadi, “Restorasi Lahan Rawa Gambut Melalui Metode Pembasahan (Sekat Kanal) Dan Paludikultur,” Jurnal Sumber Daya Air, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 103–118, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.32679/jsda.v16i2.677.

S. Soniati, N. Rohima, and D. Larasanti, “Restorasi Gambut Melalui Partisipasi Masyarakat Dan Revegetasi,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional 2 Quo Vadis Restorasi Gambut di Indonesia: Tantangan & Peluang Menuju Ekosistem Gambut Berkelanjutan, pp. 282–287, Oct. 2022.

Y. Rochmayanto, D. Priatna, and Ari. Wibowo, Restorasi Ekosistem Hutan Rawa Gambut. 2021.

Norhalimah, M. Ruslan, and Suyanto, “Analisis Tinggi Muka Air Tanah Dan Pemetaannya Di Lahan Gambut Kawasan Hutan Lindung Liang Anggang Kalimantan Selatan,” Jurnal Sylva Scienteae, vol. 04, no. 4, Aug. 2021.

N. Anggita, “Analisis Value for Money Pada Pembangunan Sumur Bor Di Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Pertanahan Provinsi Sumatera Selatan Tahun Anggaran 2018,” pp. 1–72, 2021.